From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Xiaochun Li <lixiaochun@open-hieco.net>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
senozhatsky@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Remove remaining boot consoles when a real console exists
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:13:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aocZgQNT4abxmOmK@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805084846.1802042-1-lixiaochun@open-hieco.net>
On Wed 2026-08-05 16:48:46, Xiaochun Li wrote:
> Boot consoles are temporary and should be removed once a real console is
> available. However, the late init cleanup currently only unregisters boot
> consoles that use init section memory. Other boot consoles are expected
> to be removed when the real preferred console is registered.
>
> This does not cover cases where a real console has registered, but the
> boot console was not removed because the real console did not become the
> preferred console. For example, with multiple console= parameters using
> the same driver, a real 8250 console may be enabled while the early
> console remains registered. The result is duplicate printk output from
> both consoles.
>
> In the mailing list discussion, two possible approaches were suggested
> to fix this problem [1]. This patch implements the first one: during
> printk_late_init(), check whether at least one real console is already
> registered. If so, unregister all remaining boot consoles. If no real
> console exists yet, keep the existing behavior and unregister only boot
> consoles that reference init section memory, avoiding a period with no
> console output while waiting for a deferred or modular real console.
>
> Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ahBsSW2bB2CRfW-k@pathway.suse.cz/ # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Xiaochun Li <lixiaochun@open-hieco.net>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 2fe9a963c823..5a5ec7ac99bd 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -4420,36 +4420,48 @@ void __init console_init(void)
> * be a brief interval in which no messages are logged to the console, which
> * makes it difficult to diagnose problems that occur during this time.
> *
> - * To mitigate this problem somewhat, only unregister consoles whose memory
> - * intersects with the init section. Note that all other boot consoles will
> - * get unregistered when the real preferred console is registered.
> + * If a real console has already registered, remove all remaining boot consoles.
> + * Otherwise, mitigate the no-console interval by removing only boot consoles
> + * whose memory intersects with the init section.
> */
> static int __init printk_late_init(void)
> {
> + bool realcon_registered = false;
Nit: I would call the variable "have_real_console" to follow the
existing naming scheme, see have_boot_console,
have_legacy_console, ...
Please, change it in v2 if we need it, ...
> struct hlist_node *tmp;
> struct console *con;
> int ret;
>
> console_list_lock();
> + for_each_console(con) {
> + if (!(con->flags & CON_BOOT)) {
> + realcon_registered = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Sashiko AI worries:
| Can this cause a period of missing console output if a non-visible console
| (like netconsole or pstore) registers early?
I do not agree. Users are able to read the messages on netconsole
or pstore, so I consider them valid real consoles.
| It looks like this checks only for the absence of CON_BOOT to consider a
| real console present. If a real hardware serial console is deferred or
| loaded as a module later, wouldn't we need to check for CON_CONSDEV to
| ensure the preferred hardware console is actually available before dropping
| the boot console?
It does not make much sense. The CON_CONSDEV flag does not
guarantee anything. It is just the best effort to mart console
which will get used by /dev/console.
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(con, tmp, &console_list, node) {
> if (!(con->flags & CON_BOOT))
> continue;
>
> - /* Check addresses that might be used for enabled consoles. */
> - if (init_section_intersects(con, sizeof(*con)) ||
> - init_section_contains(con->write, 0) ||
> - init_section_contains(con->read, 0) ||
> - init_section_contains(con->device, 0) ||
> - init_section_contains(con->unblank, 0) ||
> - init_section_contains(con->data, 0)) {
> + if (!realcon_registered) {
> + /* Check addresses that might be used for enabled consoles. */
> + if (!init_section_intersects(con, sizeof(*con)) &&
> + !init_section_contains(con->write, 0) &&
> + !init_section_contains(con->read, 0) &&
> + !init_section_contains(con->device, 0) &&
> + !init_section_contains(con->unblank, 0) &&
> + !init_section_contains(con->data, 0))
> + continue;
> +
> /*
> * Please, consider moving the reported consoles out
> * of the init section.
> */
> pr_warn("bootconsole [%s%d] uses init memory and must be disabled even before the real one is ready\n",
> con->name, con->index);
> - unregister_console_locked(con);
> }
> +
> + unregister_console_locked(con);
Another comment from Sashiko AI:
| Does this unconditional unregistration bypass the keep_bootcon command-line
| parameter?
|
| If a user boots with keep_bootcon to preserve early boot consoles for
| debugging, it appears this code will bypass the keep_bootcon flag check
| traditionally used in register_console() and unexpectedly unregister the
| debugging consoles once a real console registers.
This one describes a real problem. We have to check the "keep_bootcon"
flag. I suggest something like:
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -4420,36 +4420,51 @@ void __init console_init(void)
* be a brief interval in which no messages are logged to the console, which
* makes it difficult to diagnose problems that occur during this time.
*
- * To mitigate this problem somewhat, only unregister consoles whose memory
- * intersects with the init section. Note that all other boot consoles will
- * get unregistered when the real preferred console is registered.
+ * If a real console has already registered, remove all remaining boot consoles.
+ * Otherwise, mitigate the no-console interval by removing only boot consoles
+ * whose memory intersects with the init section.
*/
static int __init printk_late_init(void)
{
+ bool have_real_console = false;
struct hlist_node *tmp;
struct console *con;
int ret;
console_list_lock();
+ for_each_console(con) {
+ if (!(con->flags & CON_BOOT)) {
+ have_real_console = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(con, tmp, &console_list, node) {
if (!(con->flags & CON_BOOT))
continue;
- /* Check addresses that might be used for enabled consoles. */
- if (init_section_intersects(con, sizeof(*con)) ||
- init_section_contains(con->write, 0) ||
- init_section_contains(con->read, 0) ||
- init_section_contains(con->device, 0) ||
- init_section_contains(con->unblank, 0) ||
- init_section_contains(con->data, 0)) {
+ /*
+ * Keep the boot console when requested or as a fallback
+ * unless it is using an init section.
+ */
+ if (keep_bootcon || !have_real_console) {
+ if (!init_section_intersects(con, sizeof(*con)) &&
+ !init_section_contains(con->write, 0) &&
+ !init_section_contains(con->read, 0) &&
+ !init_section_contains(con->device, 0) &&
+ !init_section_contains(con->unblank, 0) &&
+ !init_section_contains(con->data, 0))
+ continue;
+
/*
* Please, consider moving the reported consoles out
* of the init section.
*/
pr_warn("bootconsole [%s%d] uses init memory and must be disabled even before the real one is ready\n",
con->name, con->index);
- unregister_console_locked(con);
}
+
+ unregister_console_locked(con);
}
console_list_unlock();
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 8:48 Xiaochun Li
2026-08-20 15:13 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2026-08-21 2:10 ` Xiaochun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aocZgQNT4abxmOmK@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaochun@open-hieco.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®