From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Sean Young <sean@mess.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Allow sleeping spinlocks on PREEMPT_RT within non_block_start()/end block.
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aog6fr80a2buniSZ@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821095755.am1-Segb@linutronix.de>
On Fri 21-08-26 11:57:55, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Commit 312364f3534cc ("kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()") added
> non_block_star()/end(). The intention was to catch any callbacks which
> depend on locks or sleep able conditionals in order to ensure forward
> progress. According to the commit message spinlocks were excluded
> "because spinlocks can't have an indirect dependency upon the page
> allocator…".
> On PREEMPT_RT this leads to a splat because spinlock_t and rwlock_t are
> turned into a sleeping spinlock which have a might_sleep() as they could
> schedule() on lock contention.
>
> Besids mm, the other used of non_block_start() is pwm. Here the hrtimer
> can acnqure a spinlock_t on RT and I can't tell other user but I assume
> it is not atomic on RT since it wouldn't be able to acquire its own
> (spinlock_t) lock.
>
> Since spinlock_t (and rwlock_t) are not problem, add a sleeping_lock
> argument to __might_resched() signaling if this is scheduling request
> is from a sleeping lock (true) or regular scheduling request (false).
> Add the `true' argument to rtlock_might_resched() which is used on
> PREEMPT_RT for both sleeping lock types.
This definitely makes a lot of sense to me. It looks like a
straightforward solution for false positives. The patch looks good to
me, I do not feel qualified to give you Acked-by though.
Thanks!
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 5 +++--
> include/linux/sched.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++---
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index e5570a16cbb1a..fbafdfe9bdb78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ extern int dynamic_might_resched(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_* */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
> -extern void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets);
> +extern void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets,
> + bool rt_sleeping_lock);
> extern void __might_sleep(const char *file, int line);
> extern void __cant_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset);
> extern void __cant_migrate(const char *file, int line);
> @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ extern void __cant_migrate(const char *file, int line);
> # define non_block_end() WARN_ON(current->non_block_count-- == 0)
> #else
> static inline void __might_resched(const char *file, int line,
> - unsigned int offsets) { }
> + unsigned int offsets, bool rt_sleeping_lock) { }
> static inline void __might_sleep(const char *file, int line) { }
> # define might_sleep() do { might_resched(); } while (0)
> # define cant_sleep() do { } while (0)
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 373bcc0598d10..650e42d55e1e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2158,9 +2158,9 @@ static inline int _cond_resched(void)
>
> #endif /* !CONFIG_PREEMPTION || CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>
> -#define cond_resched() ({ \
> - __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); \
> - _cond_resched(); \
> +#define cond_resched() ({ \
> + __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0, false); \
> + _cond_resched(); \
> })
>
> extern int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __must_hold(lock);
> @@ -2186,19 +2186,19 @@ extern int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock) __must_hold(lock);
> (PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET + (1U << MIGHT_RESCHED_RCU_SHIFT))
> #endif
>
> -#define cond_resched_lock(lock) ({ \
> - __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS); \
> - __cond_resched_lock(lock); \
> +#define cond_resched_lock(lock) ({ \
> + __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS, false); \
> + __cond_resched_lock(lock); \
> })
>
> -#define cond_resched_rwlock_read(lock) ({ \
> - __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS); \
> - __cond_resched_rwlock_read(lock); \
> +#define cond_resched_rwlock_read(lock) ({ \
> + __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS, false); \
> + __cond_resched_rwlock_read(lock); \
> })
>
> -#define cond_resched_rwlock_write(lock) ({ \
> - __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS); \
> - __cond_resched_rwlock_write(lock); \
> +#define cond_resched_rwlock_write(lock) ({ \
> + __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS, false); \
> + __cond_resched_rwlock_write(lock); \
> })
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
> index 1d5e1b3c60bfa..0a89e7f10af18 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> (rcu_preempt_depth() << MIGHT_RESCHED_RCU_SHIFT)
>
> #define rtlock_might_resched() \
> - __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, RTLOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS)
> + __might_resched(__FILE__, __LINE__, RTLOCK_RESCHED_OFFSETS, true)
>
> static __always_inline void rtlock_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 96226707c2f61..ee0fbb41fc61c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -9123,7 +9123,7 @@ void __might_sleep(const char *file, int line)
> (void *)current->task_state_change,
> (void *)current->task_state_change);
>
> - __might_resched(file, line, 0);
> + __might_resched(file, line, 0, false);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
>
> @@ -9148,7 +9148,8 @@ static inline bool resched_offsets_ok(unsigned int offsets)
> return nested == offsets;
> }
>
> -void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets)
> +void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets,
> + bool rt_sleeping_lock)
> {
> /* Ratelimiting timestamp: */
> static unsigned long prev_jiffy;
> @@ -9159,7 +9160,7 @@ void __might_resched(const char *file, int line, unsigned int offsets)
> rcu_sleep_check();
>
> if ((resched_offsets_ok(offsets) && !irqs_disabled() &&
> - !is_idle_task(current) && !current->non_block_count) ||
> + !is_idle_task(current) && (rt_sleeping_lock || !current->non_block_count)) ||
> system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING || system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING ||
> oops_in_progress)
> return;
> --
> 2.55.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 9:57 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-21 11:46 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2026-08-21 12:13 ` [PATCH] sched: Allow sleeping spinlocks on PREEMPT_RT within non_block_start() section David Woodhouse
2026-09-16 15:51 ` [PATCH v2] sched: Allow sleeping spinlocks on PREEMPT_RT within non_block_start()/end block Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aog6fr80a2buniSZ@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®