From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-189.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F27388E43 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.189 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787601931; cv=none; b=e7Tk8jecmvSesR0052Izv8xYgHgKW7FsWdw0Q4t9e4LaeelxODKqwXtbuR36ONWbC3FghMasFvxIM8kOrXEbQArxY0M8WOSqTRFg/GuFm+bGT2TY3D5H7dwIeXsCcH5XGXFlf5G9/vmHyFFailUOSC6A2hCaI0WU1L9AKSioFro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787601931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cDaxavN3YsQTGlyaT2Hh5wZsVWAILscK7C8PR7eni/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aS5Ve578S4xD/5gNaU01yleexOZjO0j3JN9eaJWlAokYnb5P08uvzuqzX0ChAm48A1uu9TSWtu4z8H96MdsbBfTxEkIl54+yfe6OJTyfFeifAyfCqJuqFmpNyJ83kGhGcFMUyHzDKxwkzJdEeWmorJXkf4rF3hdd4RqHkNzuvpc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=SmKSF22X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.189 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="SmKSF22X" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=cDaxavN3YsQTGlyaT2Hh5wZsVWAILscK7C8PR7eni/8=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1787601926; v=1; x=1788206726; b=SmKSF22XETMJFReee/ZW6Du8yL4xCbaaY4bj9oCpAf+QT3agCrojEnzCkUdb3G0N2rGOFJzl NAWTbGFR3iHEfzqAGZyrNGna8rOuQrgmFf9ZwEx1fUzGGtJ/FakAXM1F8B6nj8nuA1CmuVA2cY2 GFpijtp8n+4pS09Sx+jg2lpw= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from localhost (2a03:2880:10ff:1f::) by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 2ab2a7625b0c0edf; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:05:26 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 2ab2a7625b0c0edf X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:05:21 -0700 From: Shakeel Butt To: Enlin Mu Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, david@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, enlin.mu@unisoc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: fix comment logic in balance_pgdat Message-ID: References: <20260821064057.4081-1-enlin.mu@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260821064057.4081-1-enlin.mu@linux.dev> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 02:40:57PM +0800, Enlin Mu wrote: > In balance_pgdat(), when the low watermark is met, processes sleeping on > pfmemalloc_wait are woken up because they are able to safely make forward > progress. > > However, the comment incorrectly states "they should not be able", > which contradicts the actual code behavior. Fix this typo to accurately > reflect the logic. > > No functional changes are introduced. > > Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu > Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu Acked-by: Shakeel Butt