mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: cdc-acm: fix racy TIOCMIWAIT implementation
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 12:01:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap6LcHWDvIWF3oNK@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72615ee3-46eb-4639-a408-ba29c1235d08@suse.com>

On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 11:50:41AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On 07.09.26 10:47, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >> On 07.09.26 08:55, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> The wakeup condition needs to be checked after adding the task to the
> >>> waitqueue and updating the task state to avoid missing a racing modem
> >>> status update or disconnect.
> >>
> >> I am sorry, but in this case I have to ask:
> >> Isn't TIOCMIWAIT inherently racy against the hardware?
> > 
> > What do you mean?
> 
> The interface does not state from or to which state it changed.
> Now you could say that it is implicitly the last time TIOCMGET
> was called, but that is
> 
> 1. not clearly stated
> 2. not enforceable

Right. The original implementation (and serial core) have always stored
the counters on entry and compared to that. So that is the defacto
semantics.

> > Looking at the implementation again now, it seems further changes are
> > needed to fix the implementation, though. The completion handler should
> > not be updating old_count. That's for each TIOCMIWAIT to do.
> 
> I am sorry to be obnoxious about that, but I am afraid that would
> break TIOCGICOUNT

Why do you think so? TIOCGICOUNT just returns the current counters.

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  6:55 Johan Hovold
2026-09-07  8:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-07  8:47   ` Johan Hovold
2026-09-07  9:13     ` Johan Hovold
2026-09-07  9:50     ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-07 10:01       ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2026-09-07 10:28         ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-07 11:38           ` Johan Hovold
2026-09-07 12:46             ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-07 13:03               ` Johan Hovold
2026-09-08  6:54                 ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-08  7:12                   ` Johan Hovold
2026-09-08  9:23                     ` Oliver Neukum
2026-09-11  6:57                       ` Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ap6LcHWDvIWF3oNK@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®