From: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: onboard_dev: add the Rockchip rk1808
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:24:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apGMEsCwly8TCOww@5be1eda4e59e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4512468.iIbC2pHGDl@diego>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 02:14:22PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Rudi,
>
> Am Freitag, 28. August 2026, 12:55:56 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Rudi Heitbaum:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 03:25:23PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 24. August 2026, 04:52:02 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Rudi Heitbaum:
> > > > The rk1808 is the npu die in an rk3399pro package. It is wired to one
> > > > of the usb3 controllers rather than to an external port, and it needs
> > > > its reference clock running before it will boot, which is exactly what
> > > > this driver exists to do for onboard devices.
> > > >
> > > > It takes no supply from the driver: the rails are sequenced elsewhere.
> > > > Only the clock matters here, and that is already optional and handled
> > > > generically.
> > >
> > > the "elsewhere" might need a bit more explanation to verify it's the right
> > > implementation. Even if the regulators are always-on or something, we
> > > still want the supplies defined - for future uses.
> >
> > As follow up on the bringup of the Rock-Pi-N10, the proposed change to the dtsi
> > for the rk3399pro-vmarc-som is here, but needs the provision of the usb first.
> > https://github.com/heitbaum/linux/commit/6b114b6fff4022c330003d7f70ce09915ffd774f
>
> I might have formulated that strangly, what I meant was, who is enabling
> the power supplies.
>
> The "NPU Power" part of any rk3399pro schematics (should) list 5 power
> supplies for the NPU block itself:
>
> NPU_LOGIC_VDD
> --> regulator likely named NPU_VDD_LOG_S0
> --> enabled by NPU_PWREN_2 gpio fixed regulator
>
> NPU_EFUSE_VQPS
> --> regulator likely named NPU_VCC1V8_EFUSE
> --> enabled by NPU_EFUSE_EN_H gpio fixed regulator
>
> NPU_CORE_VDD
> --> regulator likely named NPU_VDD_S0
> --> TCS4525 regulator with voltage being set via the i2c controller
> inside the NPU - but enabled by the NPU_PWREN_6 gpio from
> core RK3399.
>
> NPU_CPU_VDD
> --> regulator likely named NPU_VDD_CPU_S0
> --> enabled by NPU_PWREN_4 gpio fixed regulator
>
> NPU_ADC_AVDD_1V8
> --> regulator likely named NPU_VCC_1V8_S3
> --> enabled by NPU_PWREN_3 gpio fixed regulator
>
> Naming might vary, I found just some EVB schematics.
>
> Someone needs to enable these, so the question was, who is doing that?
Hi Heiko,
I hadn't looked in to these from the mainline viewpoint. I had been
using an adapted vendor script based on the radxa npu_powerctl binary
which reimplements the npu_reset sequence over GPIO.
This has been the sequence:
gpio0 line 4 NPU_PWREN_1 -> 1, 2 ms
gpio0 line 10 NPU_PWREN_2 -> 1, 2 ms
gpio0 line 11 NPU_PWREN_3 -> 1, 2 ms
gpio1 line 22 -> 1, 2 ms
gpio1 line 23 -> 1, 2 ms
gpio1 line 24 NPU_PWREN_6 -> 1, 25 ms
gpio1 line 0 -> 1 (reset release)
I have the schematics and the working N10 here, so let me look into
describing these in the .dts and update the onboard_usb_dev.h.
Would you prefer that once I have a working and tested dts description of
the rk1808 - submit the onboard_usb_dev.h and rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
changes as a patchset - or just update the onboard_usb_dev.h as a v2?
Regards
Rudi
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 2:52 Rudi Heitbaum
2026-08-27 13:25 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-08-28 10:55 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2026-08-28 12:14 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-08-28 13:24 ` Rudi Heitbaum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apGMEsCwly8TCOww@5be1eda4e59e \
--to=rudi@heitbaum.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®