From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770BE41F5D8; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788341706; cv=none; b=VDr859CalZJYFLntNV8G5tTT5vzKHLpDTtVGEyWiAPaW8TS3yfRYWKjIkCf1roIpUoWPwKHfHy2koUqprXqAw1Zb9zst3TgD7yL4nSEQfGyQ4PD0FEEu8jQmtbYGhcKN4c6weXlyK573eIMAWl3abkd9Pn0eCFDNRnLhDVkSIsE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788341706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H3bwyw2iZ3rYwpkMDEKE+j0pNhVGyd2GhNusj8uEgYk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PcAczUpx0LndSZqfbjmFV+0woMlcB5tFQ1a0qfsnBjGnmGvoT/B0NmzCIokmHGNS65jVcaIB3EmQNJC3eIp2enSt29xYCdu1aZs4hHFj3dclz2SZTECpHmpftveAEfIyhBg6YmV5LouwkLVq/4XmgvXsIljRh2JWEatcuuGgsXg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=RQFtdSYS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="RQFtdSYS" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2AB1476; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e129823.arm.com (e129823.arm.com [10.2.213.3]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 235E53F85F; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:35:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1788341702; bh=H3bwyw2iZ3rYwpkMDEKE+j0pNhVGyd2GhNusj8uEgYk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RQFtdSYSbcyPA8zBsDWpEdfa3CU165hfy6Sb+qWDQfvRputwTKzRXfLztTQKYgCwj pVxkqBx5TPskIibxs17PbdC3e2A/wi79t9WSKs06fWolz9mPqFvzvEp9hdbWLmCQga WV1I71GSIh9xQW136ZxVaidnxBdLiyfbp+xCBEws= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 10:34:57 +0100 From: Yeoreum Yun To: Breno Leitao Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Yeoreum Yun , Ilias Apalodimas , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Tony Luck , "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] efi/runtime-wrappers: bound the wait for EFI runtime service calls Message-ID: References: <20260616-efi_timeout-v3-0-76dd1d26657b@debian.org> <20260616-efi_timeout-v3-5-76dd1d26657b@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Breno, > Hello Ard, > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2026 at 07:25:19PM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Sounds good. Let's wait for Ard's feedback on the additional patches > > > [1], and we can decide how to proceed from there. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/alDDv3XGXVdd1mri@gmail.com/ [1] > > > > Please send patches against efi/next, I will apply them promptly. > > Acknowledged. I'll rebase the fixes on efi/next and send them shortly. > > > UpdateCapsule is a special case that we can deal with separately > > Understood. I understand I should defer the configurable timeout work > for now. If you don't mind, Could I send the patch? TBH, If we handle the UpdateCapsule seperately, I think it seems good to make a exception for capsule update to wait unlimit. -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun