From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4F439A070 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788429546; cv=none; b=bLijxoHI7GiTEPtwZkgw5OOCOyCvfvkUwENS/CAMVEsDqk/JW9rwTDmB6kJvPyX9vbXsThPtdywO28ecQ2zx/RdSwZnTSDQcIJR69QKwX7HfFoAFbFW0+KmMPBf7RTzMdKmFxJvduCh4ujt+daJhqVfcQUQt2gZpE7l2UiLsN8Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788429546; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+1a8xrRM2EChN9agnwKhCP3ps/8FdfUQGsQaIjJ7bvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YVrX3GsfKtKcc6jOj7OTwAhT/FYTCDjWWdRwJU65u5QBUZcbMENA26KoNBO/3qqp6Fvwmzry5jOO8pIJmXl0fJR6vB1pMDXtVS6C3tje2FNyVom7cWwrVqZ7bLwhC6WRttagrp67Nf2B/kG7crorddnBa8MmT8iMtkxx9glJ+aE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gmN9K4bM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gmN9K4bM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87FDE1F000E9; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:59:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788429545; bh=9XVO5Ta0IlwuGw85TjZzFhxUBR2MtdsWEcDSl8od1G8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gmN9K4bMBCw6stpsDmiWobIxQ0RvDJfhDW+32XVV1v8CkVtMzM+T29kPYpSM4s5Qr nUyOZRHo5VoOs7iZ5sYNMCceKd0xlqhj7kgTUpWt+ePe5BCNfRpsp7ZslfVWip7DbW mH9pEW5/7kDWFbfgJm0umLQxqW4auboR+KbIVH+GgBQlhsgMAUQ/TAjDqkQ+P5UQQE 6a9MNt8vJrQXUoASjZrtA+hYHmkHEKTFl33RkzgxOO+y5Z9BqIkY87fxc2WU5MlZDr dABQNJEkC1n1uUL+1g3GbYJp0TD6/o6gX4cPs2Z18+UndVDAf9cHOHJCc2JGIf6kLx p9r/j05v4r3ZA== Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:59:01 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Luca Ceresoli Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Jessica Zhang , Linus Walleij , Inki Dae , Jagan Teki , Marek Szyprowski , Albert Esteve , Anusha Srivatsa , Dmitry Baryshkov , Hui Pu , Ian Ray , Thomas Petazzoni , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/19] drm/bridge: panel: move to a new module Message-ID: References: <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-0-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-2-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha384; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e35cytbik5skmzlj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-2-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> --e35cytbik5skmzlj Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/19] drm/bridge: panel: move to a new module MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 10:11:05AM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Work is in progress for every drm_panel to embed a drm_bridge, which will > make the drm_panel code (currently in the drm module) depend on the > drm_kms_helper module. >=20 > However that would create a dependency loop: >=20 > * the panel_bridge code in bridge/panel.c [drm_kms_helper module] > already depends on the drm_panel.c code (it manipulates a drm_panel) > * additionally, the drm_panel.c code, in order to create a drm_bridge, > will depend on the helpers in drm_atomic_helper and drm_probe_helper > code [drm_kms_helper module] >=20 > Prevent the loop by moving the panel bridge out to its own module. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli Again, in the previous discussion, I suggested that you moved the drm_panel code into its own module. If you're doing everything at once, it will break, but the only source of breakage you're talking about here are introduced by *future* patches, not the current state. So, what prevented you *in this patch* from moving drm_panel into its own module? Maxime --e35cytbik5skmzlj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJUEABMJAB0WIQTkHFbLp4ejekA/qfgnX84Zoj2+dgUCaplE5QAKCRAnX84Zoj2+ dvtvAYDnKu6rquhu1DCTz6Cy0wciLrh0AbLIZ0A/WZT/0I2QkHpX9Vp7+m8lw4AL TTy4eqkBf0MIQFG44WvI5gIAYH73n10n2JvmboWwp48OVdWuleRQpOF67iCt7ZEQ hkRvB7679g== =Fv9N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e35cytbik5skmzlj--