mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 18:27:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apmt9CgCEsDbfIKi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903114845.4eec2020@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue,  1 Sep 2026 16:54:43 +0100
> Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com> wrote:
> 
> > Concurrent subbuffer resizes may crash trace_pipe_raw readers or leak
> > uninitialized memory to userspace due to stale size values.
> > 
> > Modify ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() to handle the resizing of an
> > existing buffer_data_read_page if necessary and add a new
> > ring_buffer_read_page_size(). This new function enables ring-buffer
> > buffer_data_read_page users to not call the racy
> > ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(). This makes the spare_size member of
> > ftrace_buffer_info redundant.
> > 
> > Finally, handle buffer_data_read_page/reader_page order discrepancy in
> > ring_buffer_read_page(). On a mismatch simply copy manually the data to
> > the buffer_data_read_page.
> 
> Let's add here:
> 
>  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260817140812.2C7D41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/
> 
> As it has more information about why we came up with this solution.
> 
> > 
> > Fixes: bce761d75745 ("ring-buffer: Read and write to ring buffers with custom sub buffer size")
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> 
> 
> 
> > -struct buffer_data_read_page *
> > -ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> > +int ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
> > +				struct buffer_data_read_page **rpage)
> >  {
> >  	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > -	struct buffer_data_read_page *bpage = NULL;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> > +	unsigned int order;
> >  
> >  	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> > -		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> >  
> > -	bpage = kzalloc_obj(*bpage);
> > -	if (!bpage)
> > -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +	if (!rpage)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	bpage->order = buffer->subbuf_order;
> > +	order = buffer->subbuf_order;
> 
> Hmm, should we add a READ_ONCE() around the subbuf_order? There's no locks
> taken here and couldn't we get some inconsistency if things change. I feel
> more comfortable knowing that "order" is consistent throughout this
> function.

Ack, I'll see if there are other lockless readers without READ_ONCE().

> 
> > +
> > +	if (*rpage) {
> > +		if ((*rpage)->order == order)
> > +			return 0;
> > +
> > +		/* We can reuse rpage, but we discard the payload */
> > +		free_pages((unsigned long)(*rpage)->data, (*rpage)->order);
> > +		(*rpage)->data = NULL;
> > +	} else {
> > +		*rpage = kzalloc_obj(**rpage);
> > +		if (!*rpage)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	(*rpage)->order = order;
> >  	cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> > +
> >  	local_irq_save(flags);
> >  	arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
> > -		*bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> > +		**rpage = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> >  		cpu_buffer->free_page.data = NULL;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
> >  	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  
> > -	if (bpage->data) {
> > -		rb_init_data_page(bpage->data);
> > +	if ((*rpage)->data) {
> > +		rb_init_data_page((*rpage)->data);
> >  	} else {
> > -		bpage->data = alloc_cpu_data(cpu, bpage->order);
> > -		if (!bpage->data) {
> > -			kfree(bpage);
> > -			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +		(*rpage)->data = alloc_cpu_data(cpu, (*rpage)->order);
> > +		if (!(*rpage)->data) {
> > +			kfree(*rpage);
> > +			*rpage = NULL;
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	return bpage;
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_alloc_read_page);
> >  
> > @@ -7050,21 +7077,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_alloc_read_page);
> >   * ring_buffer_free_read_page - free an allocated read page
> >   * @buffer: the buffer the page was allocate for
> >   * @cpu: the cpu buffer the page came from
> > - * @data_page: the page to free
> > + * @rpage: the buffer_dat_read_page to free
> >   *
> >   * Free a page allocated from ring_buffer_alloc_read_page.
> >   */
> >  void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
> > -				struct buffer_data_read_page *data_page)
> > +				struct buffer_data_read_page *rpage)
> >  {
> >  	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
> > -	struct buffer_data_page *dpage = data_page->data;
> > -	struct page *page = virt_to_page(dpage);
> > +	struct buffer_data_page *dpage;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> > +	struct page *page;
> >  
> >  	if (!buffer || !buffer->buffers || !buffer->buffers[cpu])
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	if (!rpage)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	dpage = rpage->data;
> > +	if (!dpage)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	page = virt_to_page(dpage);
> > +
> >  	cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -7072,14 +7108,14 @@ void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
> >  	 * is different from the subbuffer order of the buffer -
> >  	 * we can't reuse it
> >  	 */
> > -	if (page_ref_count(page) > 1 || data_page->order != buffer->subbuf_order)
> > +	if (page_ref_count(page) > 1 || rpage->order != buffer->subbuf_order)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> >  	local_irq_save(flags);
> >  	arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (!cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
> > -		cpu_buffer->free_page = *data_page;
> > +		cpu_buffer->free_page = *rpage;
> >  		dpage = NULL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -7087,8 +7123,8 @@ void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
> >  	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  
> >   out:
> > -	free_pages((unsigned long)dpage, data_page->order);
> > -	kfree(data_page);
> > +	free_pages((unsigned long)dpage, rpage->order);
> > +	kfree(rpage);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_free_read_page);
> >  
> > @@ -7159,10 +7195,9 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> >  	if (!dpage)
> >  		return -1;
> >  
> > -	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
> > +	len = min_t(size_t, len, rb_read_page_capacity(data_page));
> >  
> > -	if (data_page->order != cpu_buffer->reader_page->order)
> > -		return -1;
> > +	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
> >  
> >  	reader = rb_get_reader_page(cpu_buffer);
> >  	if (!reader)
> > @@ -7177,16 +7212,18 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> >  	/* Check if any events were dropped */
> >  	missed_events = cpu_buffer->lost_events;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If this page has been partially read or
> > -	 * if len is not big enough to read the rest of the page or
> > -	 * a writer is still on the page, then
> > -	 * we must copy the data from the page to the buffer.
> > -	 * Otherwise, we can simply swap the page with the one passed in.
> > -	 */
> > +	 /*
> > +	  * It is not possible to swap the reader page if:
> > +	  *   - It has been partially read
> > +	  *   - len is not big enough to read it entirely
> > +	  *   - A writer is still on it
> > +	  *   - The ring buffer is static
> > +	  *   - The order doesn't match
> > +	  */
> >  	if (read || (len < (size - read)) ||
> >  	    cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page ||
> > -	    rb_is_static(cpu_buffer)) {
> > +	    rb_is_static(cpu_buffer) ||
> > +	    data_page->order != reader->order) {
> >  		struct buffer_data_page *rpage = cpu_buffer->reader_page->page;
> >  		unsigned int rpos = read;
> >  		unsigned int pos = 0;
> > @@ -7280,7 +7317,7 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> >  		 * missed events, then record it there.
> >  		 */
> >  		if (missed_events > 0 &&
> > -		    rb_page_capacity(reader) - size >= sizeof(missed_events)) {
> > +		    rb_read_page_capacity(data_page) - size >= sizeof(missed_events)) {
> >  			memcpy(&dpage->data[size], &missed_events,
> >  			       sizeof(missed_events));
> >  			local_add(RB_MISSED_STORED, &dpage->commit);
> > @@ -7300,8 +7337,8 @@ int ring_buffer_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> >  	/*
> >  	 * This page may be off to user land. Zero it out here.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (size < rb_page_capacity(reader))
> > -		memset(&dpage->data[size], 0, rb_page_capacity(reader) - size);
> > +	if (size < rb_read_page_capacity(data_page))
> > +		memset(&dpage->data[size], 0, rb_read_page_capacity(data_page) - size);
> >  
> >  	return read;
> >  }
> > @@ -7319,6 +7356,18 @@ void *ring_buffer_read_page_data(struct buffer_data_read_page *page)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_read_page_data);
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * ring_buffer_read_page_size - get size of the read page.
> > + * @page:  the page to get the size from
> > + *
> > + * Returns size of the page in bytes.
> > + */
> > +unsigned int ring_buffer_read_page_size(struct buffer_data_read_page *rpage)
> > +{
> > +	return PAGE_SIZE << rpage->order;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_read_page_size);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get - get size of the sub buffer.
> >   * @buffer: the buffer to get the sub buffer size from
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> > index 593e3b59e42e..c3d34c0e64e2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static enum event_status read_event(int cpu)
> >  
> >  static enum event_status read_page(int cpu)
> >  {
> > -	struct buffer_data_read_page *bpage;
> > +	struct buffer_data_read_page *bpage = NULL;
> >  	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> >  	struct rb_page *rpage;
> >  	unsigned long commit;
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static enum event_status read_page(int cpu)
> >  	int inc;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	bpage = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(buffer, cpu);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(bpage))
> > +	ret = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(buffer, cpu, &bpage);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return EVENT_DROPPED;
> >  
> >  	page_size = ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(buffer);
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > index a946e0183fd1..7ba3856daf44 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > @@ -7082,8 +7082,8 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> >  {
> >  	struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data;
> >  	struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
> > +	unsigned int spare_size;
> >  	void *trace_data;
> > -	int page_size;
> >  	ssize_t ret = 0;
> >  	ssize_t size;
> >  
> > @@ -7093,36 +7093,24 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> >  	if (iter->snapshot && tracer_uses_snapshot(iter->tr->current_trace))
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  
> > -	page_size = ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer);
> > -
> > -	/* Make sure the spare matches the current sub buffer size */
> > +again:
> >  	if (info->spare) {
> > -		if (page_size != info->spare_size) {
> > -			ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
> > -						   info->spare_cpu, info->spare);
> > -			info->spare = NULL;
> > -		}
> > +		spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare);
> > +		/* Do we have previous read data to read? */
> > +		if (info->read < spare_size)
> > +			goto read;
> >  	}
> 
> I would have ring_buffer_free_read_page() accept a null pointer and then here do:
> 
> 	spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare);
> 
>  again:
> 	/* Do we have previous read data to read? */
> 	if (info->read < spare_size)
> 		goto read;
> 
> As the jump to here below has already calculated the spare_size, why do it again?
> 
> Have ring_buffer_read_page_size() be:
> 
> unsigned int ring_buffer_read_page_size(struct buffer_data_read_page *rpage)
> {
> 	return rpage ? PAGE_SIZE << rpage->order : 0;
> }
> 
> Then info->read could not be less than spare_size if there was no spare.

Sounds good.

> 
> >  
> > -	if (!info->spare) {
> > -		info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
> > -							  iter->cpu_file);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) {
> > -			ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare);
> > -			info->spare = NULL;
> > -		} else {
> > -			info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
> > -			info->spare_size = page_size;
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -	if (!info->spare)
> > +	/* Make sure the read page order is aligned with the current subbuf order */
> 
> The above comment doesn't really make sense anymore since the user here
> should not care about the order. I would nuke it.

ack.

> 
> > +	ret = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file,
> > +					  &info->spare);
> > +	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	/* Do we have previous read data to read? */
> > -	if (info->read < page_size)
> > -		goto read;
> > +	spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare);
> > +	info->read = spare_size;
> > +	info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
> >  
> > - again:
> >  	trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file);
> >  	ret = ring_buffer_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
> >  				    info->spare,
> > @@ -7148,8 +7136,9 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	info->read = 0;
> > +
> >   read:
> > -	size = page_size - info->read;
> > +	size = spare_size - info->read;
> >  	if (size > count)
> >  		size = count;
> >  	trace_data = ring_buffer_read_page_data(info->spare);
> > @@ -7199,17 +7188,17 @@ int tracing_buffers_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >  }
> >  
> >  struct buffer_ref {
> > -	struct trace_buffer	*buffer;
> > -	void			*page;
> > -	int			cpu;
> > -	refcount_t		refcount;
> > +	struct trace_buffer		*buffer;
> > +	struct buffer_data_read_page	*rpage;
> > +	int				cpu;
> > +	refcount_t			refcount;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void buffer_ref_release(struct buffer_ref *ref)
> >  {
> >  	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&ref->refcount))
> >  		return;
> > -	ring_buffer_free_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->cpu, ref->page);
> > +	ring_buffer_free_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->cpu, ref->rpage);
> >  	kfree(ref);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -7270,23 +7259,12 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> >  	};
> >  	struct buffer_ref *ref;
> >  	bool woken = false;
> > -	int page_size;
> >  	int entries, i;
> >  	ssize_t ret = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (iter->snapshot && tracer_uses_snapshot(iter->tr->current_trace))
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  
> > -	page_size = ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer);
> > -	if (*ppos & (page_size - 1))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -	if (len & (page_size - 1)) {
> > -		if (len < page_size)
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -		len &= (~(page_size - 1));
> > -	}
> 
> OK, you are removing this so that it is tested in the loop?

Yes, page_size can now be modified between iterations.

> 
> > -
> >  	if (splice_grow_spd(pipe, &spd))
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > @@ -7294,7 +7272,8 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> >  	trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file);
> >  	entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < spd.nr_pages_max && len && entries; i++, len -= page_size) {
> > +	for (i = 0; i < spd.nr_pages_max && len && entries; i++) {
> 
> Is there a reason you moved the len -= page_size from here to the end of
> the loop?  Basically that has no functional change.

Same reason as above, page_size can be modified and I thought it'd be more clear
to see the declaration within the loop, but yes, that wouldn't change anything.

I'll keep it as-is.

> 
> > +		unsigned int page_size;
> 
> Was that just to move page_size here?
> 
> Let's keep it as-is.
> 
> >  		struct page *page;
> >  		int r;
> >  
> > @@ -7306,25 +7285,36 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> >  
> >  		refcount_set(&ref->refcount, 1);
> >  		ref->buffer = iter->array_buffer->buffer;
> > -		ref->page = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(ref->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(ref->page)) {
> > -			ret = PTR_ERR(ref->page);
> > -			ref->page = NULL;
> > +
> > +		ret = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(ref->buffer, iter->cpu_file, &ref->rpage);
> > +		if (ret) {
> >  			kfree(ref);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  		ref->cpu = iter->cpu_file;
> >  
> > -		r = ring_buffer_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->page,
> > -					  len, iter->cpu_file, 1);
> > +		page_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(ref->rpage);
> > +
> > +		r = -EINVAL;
> > +		if (IS_ALIGNED(*ppos, page_size) && len >= page_size) {
> > +			r = ring_buffer_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->rpage, len, iter->cpu_file, 1);
> > +		} else if (!i) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * If the first iteration fails this is an invalid
> > +			 * userspace input. Otherwise, this is because the
> > +			 * subbuf order has been modified. Do not report an
> > +			 * error and finish the read.
> > +			 */
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> This is more likely to be true not because the subbuf order was modified,
> but also if the length was not a multiple of page_size. From the code you
> removed;
> 
> -	if (len & (page_size - 1)) {
> -		if (len < page_size)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		len &= (~(page_size - 1));
> -	}
> 
> It would error if len was smaller than page_size but otherwise it would
> modify len to be a multiple of page_size.
> 
> The overall behavior is the same, but the comment needs to be updated.
> 
> -- Steve

I believe "len < page_size" is what I meant by "invalid userspace input", I'll
rephrase it to something more clear. I've just had a hard time myself
understanding that comment.

-- 
Vincent

> 
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		if (r < 0) {
> > -			ring_buffer_free_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->cpu,
> > -						   ref->page);
> > +			ring_buffer_free_read_page(ref->buffer, ref->cpu, ref->rpage);
> >  			kfree(ref);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  
> > -		page = virt_to_page(ring_buffer_read_page_data(ref->page));
> > +		page = virt_to_page(ring_buffer_read_page_data(ref->rpage));
> >  
> >  		spd.pages[i] = page;
> >  		spd.partial[i].len = page_size;
> > @@ -7332,6 +7322,7 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
> >  		spd.partial[i].private = (unsigned long)ref;
> >  		spd.nr_pages++;
> >  		*ppos += page_size;
> > +		len -= page_size;
> >  
> >  		entries = ring_buffer_entries_cpu(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > index 74a7a50d1e78..203d098ee14e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > @@ -745,11 +745,10 @@ static inline int tracing_get_cpu(struct inode *inode)
> >  void tracing_reset_cpu(struct array_buffer *buf, int cpu);
> >  
> >  struct ftrace_buffer_info {
> > -	struct trace_iterator	iter;
> > -	void			*spare;
> > -	unsigned int		spare_cpu;
> > -	unsigned int		spare_size;
> > -	unsigned int		read;
> > +	struct trace_iterator		iter;
> > +	struct buffer_data_read_page	*spare;
> > +	unsigned int			spare_cpu;
> > +	unsigned int			read;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01 15:54 [PATCH v9 0/4] ring-buffer: Fixes for subbuf resizing and persistent buffers Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-01 15:54 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] ring-buffer: Allow splice reads on static buffers Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 18:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-01 15:54 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 15:48   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 17:27     ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2026-09-01 15:54 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] ring-buffer: Cap static ring buffer nr_pages Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 16:56   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 17:06     ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 17:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-04 13:04     ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-04 14:02       ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-01 15:54 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] ring-buffer: Prevent truncation of nr_pages / nr_subbufs Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 17:16   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 17:37     ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-03 18:17       ` Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 14:31 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] ring-buffer: Fixes for subbuf resizing and persistent buffers Steven Rostedt
2026-09-03 15:19   ` Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apmt9CgCEsDbfIKi@google.com \
    --to=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®