From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94411471277; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 08:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788940944; cv=none; b=kinW65nYrV0kr2W3Ngg4oJLL0Xzlj3ldG9whLa+kehWXkbXKgUgPtZlulxTehN+gK/sCxO1YoCpW/t9cMchXH7lWV2RVMkN6VnG8kBPKF4HyQyTwkMrkUmXG5hWvOyl/pD54ZGeSGurKlibWAGriBdokOm2eSNoWKkNhh/S5vIc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788940944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u2lvRYHXsCWp/lTMMlUC1kU83R9bpR1B3PSOasOvNnU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WWhf73I43hS4lDzdL767dLJpELkCrw72bT0BPK9C9279W/i1q6tuhJFtk618iELii+AvFryfs9lNX5cjCd93VMC1CFcqvgG+Tk7EgQr/ostnS5O+0cqpMqVLleUD2RIG0SbxB67RkJJaYhTlTOH05SYoNQjcCbL+xH7gplIMaCY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lFSBvtL+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lFSBvtL+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31ECF1F00A3A; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 08:02:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788940943; bh=FifjGmW6Sh7JjhtvCMK2o/UaNn2Q1/ZuvVfOlpEY4O4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lFSBvtL+UjNsOM5WO8mvehrzUCakIZ0Rhq0vKyliMAyQ25MB30IKHea6kwq5Q0QEh EKlVe47sJRZOjTXfoGugg0S+kh+xP5b1mJKqfZQsi6OJ/hhn7piWWyRWgBXSJUGFb/ VsQA8WF2SefI2aNkuw0XJTfhil/Vb7UjfPZDpgAaG62pT1zuWS1bvTCulgOJPJga6F YLozBKg08p+T30heB7NTt/g/VBile7RTxsdo5nM9W366G2+3x1dHpdhTrCdeOrg2Fz A0nyAnZyqxloC9ATwtMJzE8//36jCiL8KRBi/Oms1KaBRtkM9pcIxvqQsnLA6IDDYw HevyJhktMfJaQ== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.99.4) (envelope-from ) id 1x4DG8-00000001zEV-2JGM; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:02:20 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:02:20 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Ulf Hansson , Jakov Novak , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, Guangshuo Li , Runyu Xiao , Shuah Khan , syzbot+1ee4f3b9228e35f14677@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: vub300: fix sleeping function call from invalid context in vub300_inactivity_timer_expired Message-ID: References: <20260816153809.7067-1-jakovnovak30@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 09:38:24AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sept 2026 at 08:57, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 04:48:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Sept 2026 at 15:55, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > Sure, but should you be scheduling rescan work before all resources have > > > > been set up and the host has been registered? > > > > > > I would like to defer that question to the TMIO experts. > > > > Are they on CC? > > Ulf was from the beginning; I had added Wolfram in my previous email. Thanks for clarifying. Johan