From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3B538D91; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788952751; cv=none; b=lgHTc7JYBkit8IAAKrK6KXelgI/IkFkMH60pyP9MdZHgVaCtJgx7Xg69b3YPn0J/UpQvpagOfQod8YOn0ppgS6X2LPgLCIzW8nXEMl6tFLlY+ci7fHZWEm409El7cX/79V4wlw3tw1BKOc2zEnpfvsd9Z1GGuqkxq6FVTJ9xHP0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788952751; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0z27TuDICIeRyqmCPKC7AxvlmQMlFwepct6/WPwp6CU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=slZ4o4VKx09zWiZZwE8zlZFvLc4vqnghDszyjci5X2UVYDdXgKnYyeTjfMf8Gn8vJLKe3gMAiIvXUpN+fTH7qMEYqbHd4dT2ucW1HbhgUghcXOoGqr/+jEN10mlZ9PHLuFKS5mFi3QRirZBwVMgtCpyf3/2WelNcztNndGZlLNg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=EKOCfyVh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="EKOCfyVh" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36281691; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 04:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 769063F528; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 04:19:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1788952743; bh=0z27TuDICIeRyqmCPKC7AxvlmQMlFwepct6/WPwp6CU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EKOCfyVh2ng6zaZCvB4qpszGmSyd2qCK9vwnww9ed6oHUevCW8yi8SF7V+nMJV7tH sXtyIoLUHEOdQ/kPSnw4B2zPF/b7eACT2Se/ohEBz5pIaADVWNmSTXqmT/0BNK2xXU Wto7H7vhGNPVKzxJnG6x5iHxz4usgjQSlWGu41Go= Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 12:19:00 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: rolanddreier@rivian.com Cc: Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Don't reuse raw xfers with async_done still armed Message-ID: References: <20260909-scmi-async-done-race-v2-0-cc5dec25c6be@rivian.com> <20260909-scmi-async-done-race-v2-2-cc5dec25c6be@rivian.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260909-scmi-async-done-race-v2-2-cc5dec25c6be@rivian.com> On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 04:32:28AM +0000, Roland Dreier via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Roland Dreier > > In SCMI raw mode, scmi_xfer_raw_worker() releases the xfer before > releasing the waiter that disarms xfer->async_done, and scmi_xfer_get() > does not clear async_done when it hands out a recycled xfer. A concurrent > transaction can therefore pick up the xfer while it still points at the > old waiter's completion, so: Hi, LGTM. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi Tested-by: Cristian Marussi Thanks, Cristian