From: Anisa Su <anisa.su887@gmail.com>
To: Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com>
Cc: Anisa Su <anisa.su887@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/events: Return IRQ_NONE when no event is pending
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 03:43:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqGo7Rtb00mgS1lH@cxlqual> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqGPliCzr8lS64K7@acer-nitro-anv15-41>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 10:25:50PM +0530, Shaikh Kamaluddin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 11:22:09AM -0700, Anisa Su wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2026 at 09:27:05PM +0530, Shaikh Kamaluddin wrote:
> > > CXL event interrupts may share an MSI/MSI-X vector with other event
> > > logs or device features. Consequently, cxl_event_thread() is registered
> > > with IRQF_SHARED and must determine whether an interrupt belongs to the
> > > event-log facility.
> > >
> > > The handler masks the Device Event Status register to the event logs
> > > supported by the driver. However, when no supported status bit is set,
> > > it exits the processing loop and still returns IRQ_HANDLED.
> > >
> > > Track whether at least one supported event status bit was observed.
> > > Return IRQ_NONE when there was no event to service, while continuing to
> > > return IRQ_HANDLED after processing one or more event logs.
> > >
> > > Fixes: a49aa8141b65 ("cxl/mem: Wire up event interrupts")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This looks similar to a patch I sent last week:
> > [PATCH v2 4/4] cxl/events: Return IRQ_NONE when no events were processed
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/8e22c1c2-8098-492a-8162-3dd27507c853@amd.com/T/#ma4cf2b2dddaeebc06cb73f81647817bdbb51963c
> >
> > It was dropped because I received the feedback that in general, the driver does
> > not need to handle device-side errors/spec-violating behaviors. I believe it
> > would apply here as well. But if I misunderstood the intent of this patch,
> > let me know.
> >
>
> Hi Anisa,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I came across your v2 patch 4 only after I
> had sent my patch.
>
> Your patch 4 is based on the preceding robustness changes in the series.
> By that point, cxl_event_thread() has been changed from the original
> do-while loop to a while (mask) loop, and
> cxl_mem_get_event_records() reports both an error return and the set of
> drained logs. The handler also uses the drained and stuck masks to
> control further retries.
>
> My patch leaves the existing event-record retrieval and do-while loop
> unchanged. It only tracks whether a supported event-status bit was
> observed and uses that information to select IRQ_HANDLED or IRQ_NONE.
> It therefore does not change the handling of mailbox errors, undrained
> logs, or retry behavior.
>
> The handled tracking in both cases addresses the same zero-status
> shared-vector case. My motivation was its effect on generic IRQ
> spurious-interrupt detection. Jonathan agreed that this is a cleanup
> rather than an interrupt-loss fix, so the Fixes tag should be dropped.
>
> Since your patch was posted first, would you like to repost the IRQ
> return change as a standalone cleanup? If so, I am happy to step back.
> If you no longer plan to pursue it, I can continue with a v2
> incorporating the review feedback.
>
> Please let me know which you prefer.
>
Hello Shaikh,
Thank you for your clarification. Please feel free to continue with v2.
Can you add me to the CC list for v2? I am working on some prepatory
patches for DCD an there would be a minor conflict with this patch,
so I will need to rebase on your changes.
Also Ben Cheatham gave the feedback to mention that "MSI will eventually
be disabled" as a consequence of this patch in the commit message on my patch,
which I think may be valuable here as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260901002912.958-1-anisa.su@samsung.com/T/#m866a4fdb159553039d8d47b6ee7f2312caa9ed73
Thanks,
Anisa
> Thanks,
> Shaikh
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Anisa
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cxl/pci.c | 5 ++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > > index c7c91e8dc51d..8b560cae91f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_event_thread(int irq, void *id)
> > > struct cxl_dev_id *dev_id = id;
> > > struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = dev_id->cxlds;
> > > struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlds);
> > > + bool handled = false;
> > > u32 status;
> > >
> > > do {
> > > @@ -527,11 +528,13 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_event_thread(int irq, void *id)
> > > status &= CXLDEV_EVENT_STATUS_ALL;
> > > if (!status)
> > > break;
> > > +
> > > + handled = true;
> > > cxl_mem_get_event_records(mds, status);
> > > cond_resched();
> > > } while (status);
> > >
> > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > + return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int cxl_event_req_irq(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u8 setting)
> > >
> > > base-commit: 7098e9cd98a05c0c5de2fae0c2465f9d966fdd07
> > > prerequisite-patch-id: 92e40cd60a697020faac475dcc77ba63b33434ea
> > > prerequisite-patch-id: 10027ad5d9aed85806047f807b3a76273b6c4a77
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 15:57 Shaikh Kamaluddin
2026-09-07 18:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 2:08 ` Li Ming
2026-09-09 19:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 16:13 ` Shaikh Kamaluddin
2026-09-08 18:22 ` Anisa Su
2026-09-09 16:55 ` Shaikh Kamaluddin
2026-09-09 18:43 ` Anisa Su [this message]
2026-09-10 16:22 ` Shaikh Kamaluddin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqGo7Rtb00mgS1lH@cxlqual \
--to=anisa.su887@gmail.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®