From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3117B3DDDDE for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789032087; cv=none; b=cOJCO6+iKAGC0HUMykEPXyUFF+i244NZMXsJ7ocldzDXjbwXqfXLsZpWnj3rzrrIIFnvQl1WaYBvssC4E19r6VcpHmaWG/O/TTBRgP2Tsx+7qtjaG/xGSvs16Q0DPeIeSxlCreaCg5hISlbRahjEkCfrlsgXOvexsnqGjhpzihA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789032087; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RGqXXGSwXhjsMD88DEwbjnX3i5ywJ/XDcVssiguJaaU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VbdjJfELaBD9nGdnavd5gkeQGBpSOAIRsQ2XEyEyoiHje31V+cbBqhHrQr7Izl9yzjlJEMfwSDTNPTnogiI3gzYjkSATLr0XgADs9xrd8SNEM6wp1FIM01R91gWBnDaxSlVKi4PuKIXmwHE/5VsTp12uwmAWGPqfW18vvXgLS38= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EM79IyR8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EM79IyR8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8F601F00893; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:21:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789032085; bh=RGqXXGSwXhjsMD88DEwbjnX3i5ywJ/XDcVssiguJaaU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EM79IyR8mF//eCB+qEW3gt6VcUTFeO9heW4KFNfDxQtLOx7H+8w4Lf8+EDsUkyHn6 0lk+89wsu8DLQzuvXWLvrnaVTc7kZbAqhtYOoVCcNggU/Qicaadwf9ueDUpqLNtulQ lSl/S/GeEH8PHr0tOrl/rFS6eT662TVsdzVQTraCu8/EOrHwQaRWo/ZfFnt+jie+ry 7LemhGSzlqXiQcXQY/e1aZScHs+azxH0HPgTcEgqHRSKu50FlLDDxS0tw+SedAOaxn jrS3IYpqC8f+GzwgmijDgZLRybgJqzbNyo8BI5K3RTs+JR5lDKYsFYomS/6aGgN3k3 fYmrQaEZIanvA== Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:51:21 +0530 From: Sumit Garg To: Andrew Davis , Jens Wiklander , Sumit Garg , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: move tee_ioctl_shm_register_data to above IOCTL definition Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Davis , Jens Wiklander , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260903175730.1909952-1-afd@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 at 14:43:44 +0530, Sumit Garg via OP-TEE wrote: >On Thu, 03 Sep 2026 at 12:57:30 -0500, Andrew Davis via OP-TEE wrote: >>Most of the struct definitions for a given IOCTL definition immediately >>preceded that definition. The struct tee_ioctl_shm_register_data is an >>exception as it is placed above the TEE_IOC_SHM_REGISTER_FD definition, >>not the TEE_IOC_SHM_REGISTER one it is to be used with. Move it down >>to match the others. >> >>This is a non-functional change for consistency and to help prevent >>someone from accidentally using the wrong struct with the wrong IOCTL >>based on the struct's location. >> >>Fix a couple small spelling issues while here. >> >>Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis >>--- >>include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >>1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > >Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg > >-Sumit Andrew, Please check your get_maintainers script, it's too old to pick up wrong maintainer's email ID. I have updated it now. -Sumit