mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicopanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] blk-iocost: charge flushes as pageless random writes
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 22:41:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqJDCtbWqXlPu0X9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908022135.1429281-2-cui.tao@linux.dev>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 10:21:32AM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Standalone flushes issued by blkdev_issue_flush() are represented as
> dataless REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH bios, which
> calc_vtime_cost_builtin() prices at zero.  The flush component of
> flush-heavy workloads such as database commits, journal flushes, and
> metadata sync is thus neither charged nor throttled: a cgroup at 1% weight
> can issue ~510k flushes per 12s, monopolizing the device while iocost
> reports zero usage.
> 
> Price them as pageless random writes (LCOEF_WRANDIO), which provides
> an approximation of the device time consumed by a flush.  For
> profiles where WRANDIO clamps to zero (ssd_dfl / ssd_fast), use a
> one-page floor (LCOEF_WPAGE).  After this patch, the same 1%-weight
> cgroup is limited to 24 flushes per 12s; on ext4, write+fsync
> workloads are correctly accounted through the journal layer (~2.2us
> per flush on the ssd_fast profile).

Flushes are actually a really interesting case.  For devics with
a non-volatile write cache they are no-ops, but submit_bio should
ensure we never see them here.  But devices with a volatile write
cache they are significantly more expensive than any kind of write.
If we touch this we should probably figure out a way to model that.
Note that this includes standalone flushes and PREFLUSH ones,
so this patch might be a good start, but still is missing a very
important part.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08  2:21 [PATCH 0/4] blk-iocost: charge flushes and zone appends Tao Cui
2026-09-08  2:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-iocost: charge flushes as pageless random writes Tao Cui
2026-09-10  5:41   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-09-16  8:21     ` Tao Cui
2026-09-08  2:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-iocost: charge zone appends as page-counted sequential writes Tao Cui
2026-09-08  2:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-iocost: account zone append completions in latency stats Tao Cui
2026-09-10  5:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-08  2:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iocost: fix stale comment in ioc_rqos_throttle() Tao Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqJDCtbWqXlPu0X9@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=josef@toxicopanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®