From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dma-mapping: split cache maintenance at highmem boundary
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:24:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqJJ5fQ60Nm6xf5G@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff220a24-edae-4b75-9873-1a58f5948a01@app.fastmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 09:24:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I can see how the fix addresses the problem, but I don't yet see
> how you can arrive in this situation. What type of memory allocation
> can produce a physically contiguous page range from multiple
> zones?
>
Hi Arnd,
You're right that a buddy allocation cannot span zones. I found this issue
during code review while investigating another ARM DMA issue. I plan to
post a patch for that soon.
My Pi test deliberately reserved the last lowmem and first highmem pages
in DT. It confirms the crash with a crossing SG entry, but I have not
found an ordinary workload that creates one. I should have made that
clear in the changelog.
In a follow-up QEMU test, sg_alloc_table_from_pages() merged the reserved
pair into one 8192-byte entry. It checks that the pages are physically
adjacent but does not check page_zone().
I also searched a bit for a real-world example. Rockchip's vendor 4.4
boot-logo code looks like a possible case: it builds an SG table from
firmware-reserved pages and calls dma_map_sg() when no display IOMMU is
used. Product logs show the boot-logo feature in use, but I found no
record of its reserved memory crossing the lowmem/highmem boundary.
Such a crossing seems unlikely.
I still think the change is worthwhile. For v2, I will update the
changelog to make the test setup and its limits clear. I may also drop the
Cc: stable tag.
Thanks,
Karl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 6:44 Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-09 7:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-10 6:24 ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]
2026-09-10 12:53 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqJJ5fQ60Nm6xf5G@gmail.com \
--to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=npitre@baylibre.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®