Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/early_printk: Avoid #VE emulation for TDX guest serial output

[Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 04:34:09PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> A TDX guest cannot execute port I/O instructions directly, but
> earlyprintk's serial console still issues plain inb()/outb() and lets
> each one fault into the #VE handler to be emulated as a TDVMCALL.
> 
> While that works, it is a roundabout way to get a character out.
> early_serial_putc() polls the LSR, and then writes a byte, but since the
> TDX guest can't directly do port I/O, a #VE exception is raised. The #VE
> handler must call TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET to find out what faulted, and then
> it can issue the TDVMCALL that does the actual work.
> 
> This makes #VE a functional mechanism for doing I/O, which is not
> desirable, is unnecessarily complicated and fragile, and results in
> twice the number of calls into the TDX module.
> 
> Instead, issue the TDVMCALL directly. In early_printk.c, port access is
> routed through static calls so the MMIO console can substitute its own
> accessors. Add a TDX pair and swap them in the same way.
> 
> Note that the output does not appear any earlier - "earlyprintk=" is an
> early_param(), so the console is still registered from
> parse_early_param(). This only changes how the bytes leave the guest
> once it is up.
> 
> LLMs were used under supervision to create this patch, to help
> understand the scope and mechanisms, create testing instrumentation
> (throwaway) to count #VEs before/after the change, and to drive lab
> machines to do this testing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c
> index cba75306e5b6..4a70799cd80a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>  #include <linux/usb/xhci-dbgp.h>
>  #include <asm/pci_x86.h>
>  #include <linux/static_call.h>
> +#include <asm/shared/tdx.h>
> +#include <asm/vmx.h>
>  
>  /* Simple VGA output */
>  #define VGABASE		(__ISA_IO_base + 0xb8000)
> @@ -111,6 +113,48 @@ ANNOTATE_NOENDBR_SYM(io_serial_out);
>  DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(serial_in, io_serial_in);
>  DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(serial_out, io_serial_out);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST
> +/*
> + * A TDX guest cannot execute port I/O instructions, so ask the VMM to do it.
> + */
> +static __noendbr unsigned int tdx_serial_in(unsigned long addr, int offset)
> +{
> +	struct tdx_module_args args = {
> +		.r10 = TDX_HYPERCALL_STANDARD,
> +		.r11 = hcall_func(EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION),
> +		.r12 = 1,			/* One byte */
> +		.r13 = TDVMCALL_PORT_READ,
> +		.r14 = addr + offset,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (__tdx_hypercall(&args))
> +		return UINT_MAX;
> +
> +	return args.r11;
> +}
> +ANNOTATE_NOENDBR_SYM(tdx_serial_in);
> +
> +static __noendbr void tdx_serial_out(unsigned long addr, int offset, int value)
> +{
> +	/* One byte */
> +	_tdx_hypercall(hcall_func(EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION), 1,
> +		       TDVMCALL_PORT_WRITE, addr + offset, value);
> +}
> +ANNOTATE_NOENDBR_SYM(tdx_serial_out);
> +
> +/* Substitute the hypercall accessors, but only in an actual TDX guest */
> +static __init void early_serial_tdx_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST))
> +		return;
> +
> +	static_call_update(serial_in, tdx_serial_in);
> +	static_call_update(serial_out, tdx_serial_out);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void early_serial_tdx_init(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST */
> +

I don't particularly like this being in early_printk.c

Maybe coco/tdx/tdx.c should provide tdx_inb() and tdx_outb() helpers
that we just hook up here?



-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov