mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Cole Munz <Munzzyy1@proton.me>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't error on dequeue of a completed request
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:39:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqSLGvMpw62nrToQ@vbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905020310.2277320-1-Munzzyy1@proton.me>

On Sat, Sep 05, 2026, Cole Munz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2026, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Why is functionfs_unbind() calling usb_ep_dequeue() unconditionally
> > after the request has already completed?
> >
> > The change ce405d561b02 looks like a workaround for a different issue.
> > Maybe the fix belongs in f_fs instead of dwc3?
> 
> The dequeue there does a real job in one case: teardown racing an ep0
> read/write. ffs_ep0_read/write hold ffs->mutex while they sit in
> __ffs_ep0_queue_wait(), so functionfs_unbind() dequeues before taking
> the mutex. The giveback with -ECONNRESET is what wakes the parked
> reader so it can return and drop the mutex, and only then can unbind
> free the request. In every other teardown the request completed long
> ago and the dequeue is a no-op, which is the case dwc3 complains
> about.
> 
> f_fs can tell those apart itself. ep0req is only ever queued from
> __ffs_ep0_queue_wait(), so set a flag there before usb_ep_queue(),
> clear it in ffs_ep0_complete(), and have functionfs_unbind() dequeue
> only when it's set. If the completion fires between the check and the
> dequeue you can still hit the dwc3 error, but that's a rare race
> window where the documented behavior is doing its job, not noise on
> every unbind.
> 
> If that direction looks right to you I'll send it as an f_fs patch,
> Cc'ing Udipto since it revisits ce405d561b02.
> 

I don't feel strongly about the print. Just wanted to raise the question
on the f_fs logic. Downgrading to dev_dbg() is fine. The intention was
to catch gadget driver misuse of dequeue(), not to flag a fatal error.

Thanks,
Thinh

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 16:13 [PATCH RESEND] " Cole Munz
2026-09-04 16:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-04 16:58   ` [PATCH v2] " Cole Munz
2026-09-04 17:07     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-04 20:00       ` [PATCH v3] " Cole Munz
2026-09-04 23:30         ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-09-05  0:02           ` Cole Munz
2026-09-05  1:22             ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-09-05  2:03               ` Cole Munz
2026-09-11 23:39                 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqSLGvMpw62nrToQ@vbox \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Munzzyy1@proton.me \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®