From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Longjun Luo <luolongjuna@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, song@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool/klp: Fix missed changes to same-named symbol references
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 17:26:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqc5Q4_9bHpAI4jh@jpoimboe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910085218.66565-1-luolongjuna@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 04:52:18PM +0800, Longjun Luo wrote:
> Hashing symbol references by demangled_name alone can miss target
> changes while the instruction or data bytes and normalized relocation
> offsets remain unchanged. This occurs when:
>
> - A global function moves between files and calls a same-named static
> function with a different implementation.
> - A function's call target changes from a global function to a
> same-named static function, without moving the caller.
> - A data object, such as an ops structure, changes its function pointer
> from a global function to a same-named static function.
These seem like unusual edge cases, is this problem theoretical or was
it a real-world bug?
> +/* Include FILE identity to distinguish same-named local targets. */
> +static inline void __checksum_update_symbol_identity(struct symbol *sym,
> + struct symbol *target)
> +{
> + const char *file_name = target->file ? target->file->name : "";
> +
> + __checksum_update(sym, file_name, strlen(file_name) + 1);
> + __checksum_update(sym, target->demangled_name, strlen(target->demangled_name) + 1);
> +}
If the .patch upgrades a function from static to global then the
function no longer has a FILE associated with it. Then with the above,
all callers to that function would be marked as changed. And note that
LTO does a lot of that, so static-to-global and global-to-static changes
are common between orig and patched objects.
Note that function change detection isn't intended to be 100% perfect
for all edge cases. The patch author needs to verify the changed
function list matches what they expect.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 8:52 Longjun Luo
2026-09-10 9:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 9:32 ` Longjun Luo
2026-09-14 0:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2026-09-14 12:12 ` Longjun Luo
2026-09-14 19:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqc5Q4_9bHpAI4jh@jpoimboe \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luolongjuna@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®