From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Restrict incremental open error unwind
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 18:17:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqdLFApaxDgj1mtZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912031112.1814574-1-sh_def@163.com>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 12:11:10PM +0900, Hui Su wrote:
> evsel__open_cpu(), evsel__tool_pmu_open() and
> evsel__hwmon_pmu_open() support opening a subrange of a CPU map, bounded
> by [start_cpu_map_idx, end_cpu_map_idx).
>
> Their error paths, however, unwind using "while (--idx >= 0)" all the way
> back to CPU index 0 regardless of start_cpu_map_idx. If lower CPU indices
> were opened by an earlier invocation, a later incremental open failure
> therefore closes those existing file descriptors and overwrites their
> slots with -1.
>
> Before this fix, running the new incremental open test demonstrates this
> corruption:
>
> $ perf test -v "Tool PMU"
> 12: Tool PMU:
> 12.1: Tool PMU : Ok
> 12.2: Tool PMU leader : Ok
> 12.3: Incremental open error unwind boundary:
> FAILED: CPU 0 FD overwritten: FD(evsel, 0, 0)=-1, expected 4
> FAILED!
>
> Stop the unwind at start_cpu_map_idx so that only file descriptors
> opened by the current invocation are rolled back.
>
> After this fix:
>
> $ perf test -v "Tool PMU"
> 12: Tool PMU:
> 12.1: Tool PMU : Ok
> 12.2: Tool PMU leader : Ok
> 12.3: Incremental open error unwind boundary : Ok
>
> Fixes: 4804e0111662 ("perf stat: Use affinity for opening events")
> Fixes: 240505b2d0ad ("perf tool_pmu: Factor tool events into their own PMU")
> Fixes: 53cc0b351ec9 ("perf hwmon_pmu: Add a tool PMU exposing events from hwmon in sysfs")
Maybe we just need to last one?
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/hwmon_pmu.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> index c6c5ebf0e935..667160f9e2cd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tool_pmu.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,16 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <internal/xyarray.h>
> +#include "cpumap.h"
> #include "debug.h"
> #include "evlist.h"
> +#include "evsel.h"
> #include "parse-events.h"
> #include "tests.h"
> +#include "thread_map.h"
> #include "tool_pmu.h"
>
> static int do_test(enum tool_pmu_event ev, bool with_pmu)
> @@ -100,9 +108,80 @@ static int test__tool_pmu_with_pmu(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> return TEST_OK;
> }
>
> +static int test__tool_pmu_incremental_open_unwind(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + struct evlist *evlist = evlist__new();
> + struct parse_events_error err;
> + struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = NULL;
> + struct perf_thread_map *threads = NULL;
> + struct evsel *evsel;
> + int ret = TEST_FAIL, fd0 = -1;
> +
> + if (!evlist)
> + return TEST_FAIL;
> +
> + parse_events_error__init(&err);
> + if (parse_events(evlist, "tool/user_time/", &err)) {
> + parse_events_error__exit(&err);
> + evlist__put(evlist);
> + return TEST_FAIL;
> + }
> + parse_events_error__exit(&err);
> +
> + evsel = evlist__first(evlist);
> + cpus = perf_cpu_map__new("0,1");
> + threads = thread_map__new_by_tid(getpid());
> + if (!cpus || !threads)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Step 1: Open CPU index 0 successfully */
> + if (evsel__open_per_cpu_and_thread(evsel, cpus, 0, threads) < 0) {
> + pr_debug("Failed to open CPU index 0\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + fd0 = (*(int *)xyarray__entry(evsel->core.fd, 0, 0));
> + if (fd0 < 0 || fcntl(fd0, F_GETFD) < 0) {
> + pr_debug("CPU index 0 FD is invalid (%d)\n", fd0);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Step 2: Intentionally trigger failure on CPU index 1 */
> + evsel->core.attr.sample_period = 1; /* Not supported for tool PMU -> -EINVAL */
> + if (evsel__open_per_cpu_and_thread(evsel, cpus, 1, threads) >= 0) {
> + pr_debug("Unexpected success opening CPU index 1 with sample_period=1\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Step 3: Check that CPU index 0's FD was NOT destroyed by CPU index 1's unwind.
> + */
> + if ((*(int *)xyarray__entry(evsel->core.fd, 0, 0)) != fd0) {
> + pr_debug("FAILED: CPU 0 FD overwritten: FD(evsel, 0, 0)=%d, expected %d\n",
> + (*(int *)xyarray__entry(evsel->core.fd, 0, 0)), fd0);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (fcntl(fd0, F_GETFD) < 0) {
> + pr_debug("FAILED: CPU 0 FD %d was closed by error unwind! errno=%d (%s)\n",
> + fd0, errno, strerror(errno));
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = TEST_OK;
> +out:
> + evsel__close(evsel);
> + perf_cpu_map__put(cpus);
> + perf_thread_map__put(threads);
> + evlist__put(evlist);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static struct test_case tests__tool_pmu[] = {
> TEST_CASE("Parsing without PMU name", tool_pmu_without_pmu),
> TEST_CASE("Parsing with PMU name", tool_pmu_with_pmu),
> + TEST_CASE("Incremental open error unwind boundary", tool_pmu_incremental_open_unwind),
> { .name = NULL, }
> };
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index d4cb455f4a7d..eb429087ebfe 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -3127,7 +3127,7 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> FD(evsel, idx, thread) = -1;
> }
> thread = nthreads;
> - } while (--idx >= 0);
> + } while (--idx >= start_cpu_map_idx);
> errno = old_errno;
> out:
> if (err)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hwmon_pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/hwmon_pmu.c
> index ed544dca70c3..96aeb379e169 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hwmon_pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hwmon_pmu.c
> @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ int evsel__hwmon_pmu_open(struct evsel *evsel,
> FD(evsel, idx, thread) = -1;
> }
> thread = nthreads;
> - } while (--idx >= 0);
> + } while (--idx >= start_cpu_map_idx);
> close(dir);
> return err;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
> index 5c30854b4644..d2f7591747d9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ int evsel__tool_pmu_open(struct evsel *evsel,
> FD(evsel, idx, thread) = -1;
> }
> thread = nthreads;
> - } while (--idx >= 0);
> + } while (--idx >= start_cpu_map_idx);
> errno = old_errno;
> return err;
> }
> --
> 2.55.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 3:11 Hui Su
2026-09-14 1:17 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqdLFApaxDgj1mtZ@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sh_def@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®