From: Masaharu Noguchi <nogunix@gmail.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen Miao <chenmiao.ku@gmail.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: sphinx-pre-install: warn about unsupported Docutils versions
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 18:19:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqe7sWNitaPYaUYc@elitemini> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53fbb5e6-70c3-49cd-96a3-3477f048eebc@gmail.com>
Hi Akira,
Thank you for the review, and for the pointer to #3099.
On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:56:16 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> Sphinx gained Docutils 0.22 support in 9.0.0
>
> This is not the case. It was done in Sphinx 9.1.0.
You are right about what matters here. 9.0.0 was announced as the release
with Docutils 0.22 support, but the LaTeX size limit that actually breaks
these builds is #3099, which was not fixed until 9.1.0 -- so the boundary
has to be 9.1.0, and v1's check skips the whole 9.0.x series. I have since
built those, and they fail:
sphinx docutils core-api admin-guide
------------------------------------------
8.2.3 0.22.4 FAILS FAILS
9.0.0 0.22.4 FAILS FAILS
9.0.4 0.22.4 FAILS FAILS
9.1.0 0.22.4 ok ok
Worth noting that the 9.0.x rows are not distro-patched: 9.0.0 through 9.0.4
declare "docutils>=0.20,<0.23" themselves, so a plain "pip install
sphinx==9.0.4" pulls Docutils 0.22.4 on its own. So the pairing is reachable
without any distribution relaxing anything.
> Fedora 45 will come with Sphinx 9.1.0.
I tested that pairing before replying, and you are right: Sphinx 9.1.0 with
Docutils 0.23, which is what F45 and rawhide ship, builds both books cleanly
here -- core-api at 1215 pages, admin-guide at 3074, no errors. So F45 is
fine.
I will fix the constant either way.
Thanks,
Masaharu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 3:13 Masaharu Noguchi
2026-09-14 4:56 ` Akira Yokosawa
2026-09-14 9:19 ` Masaharu Noguchi [this message]
2026-09-14 5:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-09-14 9:52 ` Masaharu Noguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqe7sWNitaPYaUYc@elitemini \
--to=nogunix@gmail.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=chenmiao.ku@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®