From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Shaobo Huang <huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: reset pointer tag of vmapped thread stack before vfree
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:44:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqfBDEkiRmlb0WWZ@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914093300.100495-1-huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com>
+cc Ulad for vmalloc stuff.
Please don't send a v2 in-reply-to a v1 or any other email.
Send the patch entirely separately.
I really need to write a bot to say this :)...
On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 05:33:00PM +0800, Shaobo Huang wrote:
> thread_stack_free_rcu() frees the vmalloc'd thread stack via
> vfree(vm_area->addr). In RCU callback context, vfree() routes to
> vfree_atomic(), which calls llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, ...)
> and writes 8 bytes to the base of the region being freed.
>
> With KASAN_SW_TAGS, vm_area->addr carries a random tag. If
> kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below() has rewritten the shadow covering
> [base, sp] to KASAN_TAG_KERNEL (0xff) -- which it does on every CPU
> resume for the current task's stack -- the llist_add store checks
> shadow[base] (0xff) against the pointer tag (random) and reports an
> invalid-access, although writing to the base of a stack queued for
> deferred free is legitimate.
>
> Reset the pointer tag to KASAN_TAG_KERNEL before vfree() so that
> kasan_check_range() short-circuits the check, the same way the task
> accesses its own stack at runtime via sp. The vmalloc lookup is safe:
> __find_vmap_area() resets the tag before comparing against va_start.
>
> Fixes: 9f7d416c3612 ("kprobes: Unpoison stack in jprobe_return() for KASAN")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: zhipuai:glm-5.2
Thanks for adding this!
New convention is to say:
Assisted-by: LLM
Rather than to list the agent.
See https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html
> Signed-off-by: Shaobo Huang <huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com>
Looks reasonable to me so, with nits addressed:
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
But I would like Ulad's input on this from vmalloc side.
> ---
> Changes since v1:
Thanks for adding this!
Nit, but nicer to say 'v2:' here I think.
> - Drop the 12-line comment; keep just the one-line fix.
> - Fix the Fixes: tag to point to the commit that introduced
> kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below (9f7d416c3612), which added
> both the function definition and the _cpu_resume call site, not
> the 2016 vfree_atomic commit.
> - Add Assisted-by tag per Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst.
> - Use real name (Shaobo Huang) instead of "sparkhuang".
> - Trim the commit message; remove the full KASAN dump.
Please give credit to reviewers for each change, e.g. 'as per XXX' :)
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260806123020.90869-1-huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com/
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 45300f59cf2c..9a66b10749de 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void thread_stack_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rh)
> if (try_release_thread_stack_to_cache(vm_stack->stack_vm_area))
> return;
>
> - vfree(vm_area->addr);
> + vfree(kasan_reset_tag(vm_area->addr));
> }
>
> static void thread_stack_delayed_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 12:30 [PATCH] " sparkhuang
2026-08-06 14:13 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-07 6:53 ` sparkhuang
2026-08-07 7:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-07 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-07 7:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-07 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 9:19 ` Shaobo Huang
2026-08-07 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-07 10:41 ` sparkhuang
2026-08-07 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-07 11:20 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 9:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Shaobo Huang
2026-09-14 9:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqfBDEkiRmlb0WWZ@gremlin \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=huangshaobo3@xiaomi.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®