From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61548415F23; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789381056; cv=none; b=eBmi1fTTDfFnC2IM62mUhgjs4RUptrrqr/ioELfGYZ+bAIT1C86hnJHbYDydqyk32CbaXkqhmZ+k5mD/hYzD6ZrTYu/hlfN/j9i3HUYYnnJhYep8m1eb7rz+fdZMcOu7nkjFAk7LvMuWXRJEDXm5uAoFKVjMGba+y8acTUY2NS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789381056; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YgwMSL2DfS6Z71Ol2dt2Xh64k0FHnIYhlRjZmBPc0hg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ERNuYNwrAPsP+7g7PxFINvRVtZIpKNP7tZgYEAUS4J+hrAqlZFqb5WLnJNPTdYfA1HpW9F3v0lA6Y9aga4EZmWJIPmIbPfC9VTab3PjQqMsnz35DK9Jh3sc0Ng10BUWnJVRZPqmjoufFUuP0mRWt3K8Z4GIBKawVcUOIS3t2kbg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lYDq+mGJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lYDq+mGJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD7D91F000FF; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:17:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789381051; bh=YgwMSL2DfS6Z71Ol2dt2Xh64k0FHnIYhlRjZmBPc0hg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lYDq+mGJqr9IgENqdrucgdgVBVO8BcmPTAGLx01IfET8Xw/MrpJTu8OLqtfTql80a 9WYWsD1y/tupjxF9WI8uuUuHBBlIs5EndFVgOL3SKxrqoXqJH1sIYXpKjV4n9Q/8Ic 4tqypts+zYeSQbcuyfbwUSHQGEdXAP5F+HoGDba6yXMRcB4WzfBl5ZwDpz+2yVH2Sy c/Krj3PXqjzks5UNih2jJQNp/pkjtWNUfIJqWY+q3UHrV/hSSFPf4TpTjwmxIHI/e5 uXuwG4EncvwTu3gjbsngvHOmeXiylJf975/pj7GVjwOqnRkC/x7i1udR6YOmSzcU9x TCpS6EUFzXJ4g== Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 390AE1AC52F1; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:17:27 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:17:27 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Carlos Song Cc: Andi Shyti , Aisheng Dong , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" , LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: regression in i2c-imx-lpi2c.c after rust-i2c-next merge (next-20260910) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c6yA6j/BNL4mrRfs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: My vaseline is RUNNING... --c6yA6j/BNL4mrRfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 03:28:29AM +0000, Carlos Song wrote: > The root cause is: > Change to lpi2c_imx_probe() from this patch[1] was replaced back with the old logic during the merge conflict resolution(2edfbdfb8f9c). > Could you help pick these missing codes back? If you think there's a fixup needed for the merge please send me a patch with that fixup. --c6yA6j/BNL4mrRfs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmqnybYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AZxAf/WfLXO+qKCuJZWHuf+qHA9f53nQcqvQKtj+NBJ4Eg7ut014zJbEMZBfAE CXozba/agwGLQ1uUWk7qtmFuZlY6NKsutbJN4w1xyTYMgR9uJczv4D5rEouOcRPw emAvd51FZrOUv5sN7Q7GYaGEHy+MZb16iU5Rvr52IMAZCW8mhks7VZQEWtoJ9juu 9RRsGZ31Cv1uZPN0v9nOrcIG9gVgENjW/SXuzcnkf8GfB92VF/VVK/F0zCERLahT JCkQyCC2uvtASmkwMx7SYBiYJUGQbew6HwChABfS1cfTjTE62MjWi244Hp8+UNCF X3UhcxFkhWtrwSDcbm4RZFnTKWvhpQ== =j71t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c6yA6j/BNL4mrRfs--