From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812D63D9DB1; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789386076; cv=none; b=KFdejeD2lhITyIvum78BSReo1gbgIFhABrzya80WG5+/IlHeH4szgoFYpI5C4MVhQnrew/2MjZUF6NuzsAscVEtDNXeMriZC4LfPloY2aYVxdRskgLqJrOPne+GVHhjxBrmS1rdadACl8kopLcoCccHq1054jWBrcBfBRXHIRb4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789386076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N145TGlKEEjodeJSTgl4qasxJaC7IdzFTs3A7Dm9l7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mtA57no1Oln36j8uKDqSp/te09I7ps+1KIFMgStdmv4JTLw0i8Mkvn/JnhsdB1ca5MmXcHEkihqT9G+Z8UcGmzlsVQB/eh2t3vnfzHifK6y2BMj7vr6Mmezk6kb53Tx60rvBAdE8pBKFmnU2Fk5W/y+Zc8+7jq4Vl+QTGnzrs4M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GT2oPx08; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GT2oPx08" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D07DD1F000FF; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:41:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789386075; bh=ZA0r8T8gYPa/w+HOZLvcmuU/WRlSIh2G+lTU2hJymnk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GT2oPx08Fmom+xQ90hhPNer6CWBRbPHnUsCe/qP7/2kg/AWuDvGPA2MC87aalTOcE IHHaWsUl3JF5ZRrD0TEZXDwUVvehmr2/GZkSq1PsiUxHQkFkdpjE2NGHJ4gMHaMgJC t+8zEA05w9aYRBXgrpg/MhNtcX+m+UpPs5SnouY9qgOqCQO/8NinRZ6aGwqXaAkXcR PBIk//ZIMemNYGaPTec86Nl043cD6sNca8GQmIfAEish8VHi13v54HNkhBLpYuN5PE RzlwjTzzZ2aCi6Z6syHOVENKLew07zK36jIpJAu8F7mnbwbtAth9evgCBwelNhbKIR ruK0YsbytgnwA== Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E7491AC52F1; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:41:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:41:12 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= Cc: Val Packett , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: use the device tree card name as long_name Message-ID: References: <20260506041112.412871-2-val@packett.cool> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="73ocKzEMsqMqvlAV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: My vaseline is RUNNING... --73ocKzEMsqMqvlAV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Guido G=FCnther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:19:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > opposite choice. Any decision here should be policy based in userspace > > based on the full system information. > Thanks for the hint. So that would mean we should do something similar > to what Lenovo does in UCM (that Val pointed to)? > https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/blob/980fb83651e82c3e53d3a0= ab7fa9b7d6fc2d809b/ucm2/Qualcomm/x1e80100/x1e80100.conf That looks plausibe, or possibly some more generic thing that teaches UCM about when to use DMI. > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so= =20 > > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > The original mail was from May so I figured ~ half a year would be o.k.? > Sorry I got that wrong. Note the bit in the mail about resending if you think things have been dropped. --73ocKzEMsqMqvlAV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmqn3VcACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CRoQf+IUvFIYmA8LI8PptQ7NGqWfDZDexspfAZ9/R+jBFgLcGVD0fVfSzw5MRQ o7hQSV4Ok93xQy//hUsjL+G7gD8Zr1BKY4ttWGAKgFo9Jl6++k/d+zSZDyx9eu8i 7AKFm39UstHTGlTiq51SdYp1OcyYL836aUJpc0lFboBFt6OE/gNhvIdeQMIPzkwt WFZ8d1azYYUz2i5pKnjtSomcG0KONsldN7vJHWV8tmVqKZGKgMVsw9+Rj2ffFvQZ uGHFVGJLnoQRXgXbSRovXrXzNmN9VZDAAAX9lBYg72yca7spdi7P0dIU02FxDLQf ZFr3z5mWAJ8QToZbnQEF+YtNb9Qbbw== =Qf6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --73ocKzEMsqMqvlAV--