mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: "A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: force internal PHYs into a known reset state
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:17:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqkpNVyoJdXpQz4n@makrotopia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915091856.1375914-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 11:18:45AM +0200, A. Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
> 
> When the switch is bootstrapped with PS_NOWAIT = 0, the internal PHYs
> default to a held-in-reset state. The driver previously only worked with
> PS_NOWAIT = 1 where PHYs are released from reset automatically.
> 
> Program the PHY reset lines via the RST_REQ register before the MDIO bus
> is registered, so that PHY IDs can be read during bus scan. Release only
> the PHYs of ports that have a phy-handle in the device tree and keep the
> unused ones held in reset. Driving both directions makes the resulting
> state identical regardless of the PS_NOWAIT bootstrap: unused PHYs no
> longer stay powered when PS_NOWAIT = 1 released them automatically.
> 
> A single 300ms delay after deasserting the needed resets ensures the PHYs
> are ready for MDIO communication (refer to Intel XWAY, Maxlinear GPY111
> datasheets or the Lantiq counterpart of the driver). The delay is skipped
> when no PHY is released from reset.
> [...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/mxl-gsw1xx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/mxl-gsw1xx.c
> index 66bf7e3319057..08c633b2caebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/mxl-gsw1xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/mxl-gsw1xx.c
> [...]
> @@ -589,6 +590,52 @@ static void gsw150_phylink_get_caps(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>  	gsw1xx_phylink_get_lpi_caps(config);
>  }
>  
> +static int gsw1xx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> +	struct gsw1xx_priv *priv = container_of(ds->priv, struct gsw1xx_priv, gswip);
> +	struct gswip_priv *gswip_priv = ds->priv;
> +	u32 phy_mask = 0, active_mask = 0;
> +	struct device_node *phy_np;
> +	struct dsa_port *dp;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(dp, ds) {

This loop runs only over *user ports*. It skips DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED.

> +		struct phylink_config cfg = {};
> +
> +		/* Is there an internal PHY on this port? */
> +		gswip_priv->hw_info->phylink_get_caps(ds, dp->index, &cfg);
> +		if (!test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL, cfg.supported_interfaces))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		phy_mask |= GSW1XX_RST_REQ_PHY(dp->index);
> +
> +		/* Will the PHY be really used? */
> +		phy_np = of_parse_phandle(dp->dn, "phy-handle", 0);
> +		if (!phy_np)
> +			continue;

Hence this check is redundant and doesn't make much sense.

> +
> +		of_node_put(phy_np);
> +		active_mask |= GSW1XX_RST_REQ_PHY(dp->index);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!phy_mask)
> +		return 0;

So this means if only the MII interfaces are in use the PHYs are
not being put into reset. Why?

> +
> +	/* Deassert resets for PHYs referenced by active ports and hold the
> +	 * unused ones in reset, so the state is identical regardless of the
> +	 * PS_NOWAIT bootstrap.
> +	 */
> +	ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->shell, GSW1XX_SHELL_RST_REQ, phy_mask,
> +				 phy_mask & ~active_mask);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (active_mask)
> +		msleep(300);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct phylink_pcs *gsw1xx_phylink_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config,
>  							 phy_interface_t interface)
>  {

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15  9:18 A. Sverdlin
2026-09-15 11:17 ` Daniel Golle [this message]
2026-09-15 11:35   ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2026-09-16 10:05 ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqkpNVyoJdXpQz4n@makrotopia.org \
    --to=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®