From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Maria Lisina <sekoohaka.sarisan@gmail.com>
Cc: lee@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Remove extra DebugFS dentry
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 19:04:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqq-AwWnyBeSeEbT@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916155407.47647-1-sekoohaka.sarisan@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 08:54:07PM +0500, Maria Lisina wrote:
> > As Lee pointed out, we are fine with 100 limit, so one line here and below.
>
> But doesn't the guideline strictly say no more than 80?
Yes it says, some maintainers used relaxed version (which is default in
checkpatch and now it's 100). Lee is the maintainer of the MFD subsystem
and it's clear he leans towards using 100 limit.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 14:36 [PATCH v6 0/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Clean up and modernize DebugFS usage Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 14:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Remove redundant DebugFS error check Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 15:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 14:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Use plain octal values for file permissions Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 14:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Remove extra DebugFS dentry Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 15:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 15:54 ` Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 16:04 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-09-16 14:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch to debugfs_remove() Maria Lisina
2026-09-16 15:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqq-AwWnyBeSeEbT@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sekoohaka.sarisan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®