mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kthread: Report cpumask allocation failure without warning
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:56:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqqR-up8wovbEsv7@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915014222.13423-2-quchaosheng000406@163.com>

Le Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 09:42:22AM +0800, Quchaosheng a écrit :
> kthread_affine_node() warns when zalloc_cpumask_var() fails:
> 
>   if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&affinity, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>           WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>           return;
>   }
> 
> The allocation uses GFP_KERNEL, so it can fail under memory pressure or
> fault injection.  A failed allocation is a recoverable condition and not a
> kernel bug, so the warning is noise.  syzbot reports it for a WireGuard
> NAPI thread:
> 
>   WARNING: kernel/kthread.c:359 at kthread_affine_node+0x200/0x2e8
>   CPU: 0 PID: 5207 Comm: napi/wg2-0
>   Call Trace:
>    alloc_cpumask_var_node+0xfc/0x138
>    zalloc_cpumask_var
>    kthread_affine_node+0x148/0x2e8
>    kthread+0x29c/0x3d4
>    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> 
> The failure is not silent though: the early return also skips
> list_add_tail() of kthread::affinity_node, so the thread never joins
> kthread_affinity_list and kthreads_online_cpu() will not fix up its
> affinity on a later CPU hotplug.  Keep the failure visible with
> pr_warn_once() instead of dropping the message.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+37ca7ae3e98cb65c3209@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=37ca7ae3e98cb65c3209
> Signed-off-by: Quchaosheng <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Keep the failure visible instead of dropping the message silently
>    (Valentine Schneider, Waiman Long).  A WARN is not appropriate for a
>    recoverable GFP_KERNEL allocation failure, but the early return also
>    keeps the thread out of kthread_affinity_list, so report it with
>    pr_warn_once().
> 
>  kernel/kthread.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index a3f95c904..b59fa7c7e 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,14 @@ static void kthread_affine_node(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&affinity, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +		/*
> +		 * The thread stays out of kthread_affinity_list, so a later
> +		 * CPU hotplug will not fix up its affinity. Report it, but do
> +		 * not warn: the allocation can fail under memory pressure or
> +		 * fault injection, and that is not a kernel bug.
> +		 */
> +		pr_warn_once("kthread: %s: no cpumask, node affinity not set\n",
> +			     current->comm);

I'm mildy convinced that this is an improvement. The message now becomes easily
missed and appears like any normal information in the logs.

Kthread creation happens mostly on boot and if there is memory pressure already
on boot, the rest is not going to end well anyway.

Thanks.

>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> 

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15  1:42 Quchaosheng
2026-09-16 12:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-09-17  9:21   ` Quchaosheng
2026-09-17 14:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqqR-up8wovbEsv7@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®