From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EB884CEE51; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789577113; cv=none; b=AQicElB06Lkj6UioaYyytkjygH4GgRtVPamAM1J2G4E7rS730A6xXBXN9hqttnsXW7c/3Tv+gFZ8SBdga2IltJUJgxu8HBZduqyiymiAUhnneaeXURKOLSmjoyOEDfQOmBu6RjvfDLyhwRhtsVaOQRlt5NnbghBvWSeL8uUNk94= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789577113; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lKcebEo9c1fVtSvGslGB1FEm6tkejxzydqZZz2/07FY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GZ9lM0exrh663C5nWMgwvxSTF9sb/lBaNXTRELNKwFZoisTYDvkofcnVoSqkYk/T9qgY/1y2Uu5fwrXwBCJRXBLpmTTCF2e24KGup+HQkvOc/m9elGRCUL75S8pLF9xl+5wln7Y0gYxelKvifzmmfBk/D8ienODh9QOl/uukCwk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xd7BNHxF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xd7BNHxF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 770061F000FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:44:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789577098; bh=3fWg49n3tDvnDx7HCJfYYRm/P8LKx19J+Y5U/c4kzqo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Xd7BNHxF2blScprlS6jNfovJFzbT1rQfDwvBai3uicjH7CT7QH/LAvW4hroXOXhcp A78X8nwpX674xFa6c2F6nKPqb7GdPXUIWSwdDqIsWQDYZ6goJJfuhzCxZ/cFbo+TuY UsdBUhGWhVQcBb3wNd0bX7kWMbg6uAM2jFIJlHD0i/RlMHBNC+BoWRX570ss/pdAUb kllw0sEqLXDog28lOHnzHUuqOaQzdQ9M9ZgbZMTR3LrFMzUO6JgwQRbPrl2zVUjFGh eqz4+2cWi3YiRgnBkbAJ9/RhAQY7hfqcy6gklzNNST5RkQO/ZTm2y/dA/4VnD7+G+h TYvf5nn5xIvnw== Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:44:57 -0700 From: Oliver Upton To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Mark Brown , Fuad Tabba , Marc Zyngier , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-x86 tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 09:43:14AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2026, Oliver Upton wrote: > > > In case anyone cares, I'm woefully behind on sending "thanks". These came from > > > the prep series for enabling PPC selftests. > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260826230511.972824-1-seanjc@google.com > > > > > > > interacting with commit > > > > > > > > 6f182db39fb00 (KVM: arm64: selftests: Add ITS table save tests) > > > > > > > > from the kvm-arm tree. I have applied the fixup below and can carry as > > > > needed: > > > > > > Given that this is in "fixes", I assume the new test will land in 7.3? If so, > > > this is mostly my problem to deal with when sending Paolo the selftests pull > > > (which, FWIW, I'm hoping to do this week so that it can be used as the base for > > > PPC selftests support). > > > > Yeah, aim here is to have the selftest go with the fix which I'll send to > > Paolo this week. Sorry for the churn. > > LOL, why are you apoligizing? You added one test, I reworked all of the core > allocator APIs. :-D I'm pretty sure you've conditioned everyone to endure at least one KVM-wide rework every release ;-)