From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org,
Hui Pu <hui.pu@gehealthcare.com>,
Ian Ray <ian.ray@gehealthcare.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/15] libfdt: Introduce fdt_getprop_by_offset_w()
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:52:28 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqtx_MzOsc3q4Gev@gractus.seuss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916124205.28a71859@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10556 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 12:42:05PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 19:56:46 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > Future operations, such as handling unknown tags on dtb modifications,
> > > need to modify properties retrieved by their offset.
> > >
> > > fdt_getprop_by_offset() already exists to get a preperty by its offset
> > > but the property returned is read-only. A writable returned property is
> > > needed.
> >
> > Since we already have fdt_get_property_by_offset_w() this is an
> > obvious gap and I'd be happy in principle to apply this independent of
> > the rest of the series.
>
> Nice :)
>
> >
> > > Fill the lack and introduce fdt_getprop_by_offset_w(), the write enabled
> > > variant of fdt_getprop_by_offset().
> > >
> > > Add also its related test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> > > ---
> > > libfdt/libfdt.h | 6 +++
> > > tests/.gitignore | 1 +
> > > tests/Makefile.tests | 2 +-
> > > tests/get_prop_offset_w.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/meson.build | 1 +
> > > tests/run_tests.sh | 1 +
> > > tests/tests.h | 1 +
> > > tests/testutils.c | 18 +++++++++
> > > 8 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100644 tests/get_prop_offset_w.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/libfdt/libfdt.h b/libfdt/libfdt.h
> > > index 7a1915a5..82965e32 100644
> > > --- a/libfdt/libfdt.h
> > > +++ b/libfdt/libfdt.h
> > > @@ -856,6 +856,12 @@ static inline struct fdt_property *fdt_get_property_w(void *fdt, int nodeoffset,
> > > #ifndef SWIG /* This function is not useful in Python */
> > > const void *fdt_getprop_by_offset(const void *fdt, int offset,
> > > const char **namep, int *lenp);
> > > +static inline void *fdt_getprop_by_offset_w(const void *fdt, int offset,
> > > + const char **namep, int *lenp)
> > > +{
> > > + return (void *)(uintptr_t)fdt_getprop_by_offset(fdt, offset, namep,
> > > + lenp);
> > > +}
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/tests/.gitignore b/tests/.gitignore
> > > index 69693129..1091174a 100644
> > > --- a/tests/.gitignore
> > > +++ b/tests/.gitignore
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ tmp.*
> > > /get_phandle
> > > /getprop
> > > /get_prop_offset
> > > +/get_prop_offset_w
> > > /incbin
> > > /integer-expressions
> > > /fs_tree1
> > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.tests b/tests/Makefile.tests
> > > index 63e201ae..0d4d399f 100644
> > > --- a/tests/Makefile.tests
> > > +++ b/tests/Makefile.tests
> > > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LIB_TESTS_L = get_mem_rsv \
> > > sw_tree1 sw_states \
> > > move_and_save mangle-layout nopulate \
> > > open_pack rw_tree1 rw_oom set_name setprop del_property del_node \
> > > - appendprop1 appendprop2 propname_escapes \
> > > + appendprop1 appendprop2 propname_escapes get_prop_offset_w \
> > > string_escapes references path-references phandle_format \
> > > boot-cpuid incbin relref_merge \
> > > extra-terminating-null \
> > > diff --git a/tests/get_prop_offset_w.c b/tests/get_prop_offset_w.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..dbfa5dd7
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/get_prop_offset_w.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
> > > +/*
> > > + * libfdt - Flat Device Tree manipulation
> > > + * Testcase for fdt_getprop_by_offset_w()
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2026 Bootlin.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > > +#include <stdio.h>
> > > +#include <string.h>
> > > +#include <stdint.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include <libfdt.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "tests.h"
> > > +#include "testdata.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define SPACE 65536
> > > +
> > > +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > +{
> > > + const void *exp_val;
> > > + const char *name;
> > > + char *modif_val;
> > > + void *propval;
> > > + int proplen;
> > > + int exp_len;
> > > + int poffset;
> > > + void *fdt;
> > > + void *buf;
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + test_init(argc, argv);
> > > + fdt = load_blob_arg(argc, argv);
> > > +
> > > + buf = xmalloc(SPACE);
> > > +
> > > + err = fdt_open_into(fdt, buf, SPACE);
> >
> > You shouldn't need an fdt_open_into(). You're modifying the contents
> > of a single property, but not moving tags about or (specifically)
> > expanding the tree as a whole. This is a "write in place" operation
> > rather than a "read/write" operation in libfdt terms.
>
> Ok, I will update in the next iteration.
>
> >
> > > + if (err)
> > > + FAIL("fdt_open_into(): %s", fdt_strerror(err));
> > > +
> > > + free(fdt);
> > > + fdt = buf;
> > > +
> > > + /* Retrieve the offset of the 'prop-str' property */
> > > + poffset = get_poffset(fdt, 0, "prop-str");
> > > + if (poffset < 0)
> > > + FAIL("Property 'prop-str' not found")
> >
> > Introducing get_poffset() seems a bit awkward compared to using an
> > fdt_for_each_property_offset() like get_prop_offset.c does.
>
> Ok, will use fdt_for_each_property_offset() directly here and remove
> get_poffset() in the next iteration.
>
> > > +
> > > + /* Get the property value for modification */
> > > + propval = fdt_getprop_by_offset_w(fdt, poffset, &name, &proplen);
> > > + if (!propval)
> > > + FAIL("fdt_getprop_by_offset_w(%d): %s", poffset,
> > > + fdt_strerror(proplen));
> > > +
> > > + /* Check original values */
> > > + if (strcmp(name, "prop-str"))
> > > + FAIL("Name mismatch : %s instead of prop-str", name);
> > > +
> > > + exp_len = strlen(TEST_STRING_1) + 1;
> > > + if (proplen != exp_len)
> > > + FAIL("Original size mismatch on property \"%s\": %d instead of %d",
> > > + name, proplen, exp_len);
> > > +
> > > + exp_val = TEST_STRING_1;
> > > + if (memcmp(exp_val, propval, exp_len))
> > > + FAIL("Original data mismatch on property \"%s\"", name);
> > > +
> >
> > You could re-use check_get_prop_offset() from testutils.c to perform
> > these tests before invoking fdt_getprop_by_offset_w().
>
> I wanted to test that the value returned by fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() is the
> correct one. check_get_prop_offset() calls fdt_getprop_by_offset() and not
> fdt_getprop_by_offset_w().
Ah, fair point.
But.. rather than checking the retreived values the same as
get_prop_offset.c, it would be both simpler and more complete to
explicitly check that fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() returns the same
pointer as fdt_getprop_by_offset().
> I know it doesn't matter with current implementation
> of fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() but I am not supposed to know about this
> implementation here in the test. Also, this implementation could change in the
> future (not planned on my side).
>
> >
> > > + if (exp_len < 4)
> > > + CONFIG("Property \"%s\" should be at least 4 bytes", name);
> > > +
> > > + /* Modify the property value */
> > > + modif_val = xmalloc(proplen);
> > > + memcpy(modif_val, propval, proplen);
> >
> > Why malloc() and memcpy()? The whole point of
> > fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() is that you get a writable pointer into the
> > fdt which you can modify in place.
>
> I want to keep the modified value for later comparison.
>
> - modif_val : Current property val + modification.
> - Update propval: Current property val.
> - Check reading the property with check_get_prop_offset() that the
> property has been really updated.
>
> If instead I use only propval, I use only one buffer and so
> - propval = modified value
> - check that get check_get_prop_offset() which will also return the
> propval buffer matches the propval buffer.
Ah, missed that, that makes sense. Personally I'd probably go with a
static buffer with the value to write in (and then compare), but
either way is fine.
> In check_get_prop_offset();
> --- 8< ---
> const void *check_get_prop_offset(void *fdt, int poffset, const char *exp_name,
> int exp_len, const void *exp_val)
> {
> const void *propval;
> ...
> propval = fdt_getprop_by_offset(fdt, poffset, &name, &proplen);
> ...
> if (exp_len && memcmp(exp_val, propval, exp_len))
> FAIL("Data mismatch on property \"%s\"", name);
> ...
> }
>
> Using a pointer returned by fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() as exp_val parameter
> leads to something like:
> memcmp(propval, propval, exp_len)
>
> This is always successful even if the propval buffer doesn't contain the
> data expected by the test. If for whatever reason the propval buffer is
> wrongly modified by some internal libfdt function called by
> check_get_prop_offset(), we cannot see it.
>
> With the additional buffer (modif_val) which is never passed to libfdt,
> and contains expected data, we can see any wrong proval modification.
>
> >
> > > + modif_val[1] = (modif_val[1] != 'A') ? 'A' : 'a';
> > > + modif_val[3] = (modif_val[3] != 'B') ? 'B' : 'b';
> > > + memcpy(propval, modif_val, exp_len);
> > > +
> > > + /* Check that the modified value is taken into account */
> > > + if (!check_get_prop_offset(fdt, poffset, "prop-str", exp_len, modif_val))
> > > + FAIL("Modified property 'prop-str' not found");
> > > +
> > > + PASS();
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> > > index 779e6bc7..dae6a941 100644
> > > --- a/tests/meson.build
> > > +++ b/tests/meson.build
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ tests = [
> > > 'get_path',
> > > 'get_phandle',
> > > 'get_prop_offset',
> > > + 'get_prop_offset_w',
> > > 'get_next_tag_invalid_prop_len',
> > > 'getprop',
> > > 'incbin',
> > > diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> > > index 225c22f8..419a24d8 100755
> > > --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> > > +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh
> > > @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ tree1_tests_rw () {
> > > run_test setprop $TREE
> > > run_test del_property $TREE
> > > run_test del_node $TREE
> > > + run_test get_prop_offset_w $TREE
> >
> > This belongs with the other write-in-place tests in tree1_tests(), not
> > as an rw test.
>
> Ok, I will move it.
>
> Best regards,
> Hervé
>
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 8:31 [PATCH v3 00/15] Add support for structured tags and v18 dtb version Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] fdtget: Use libfdt iterators instead of open coded loops Herve Codina
2026-08-27 3:55 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] libfdt: Don't assume the root node is available at offset 0 Herve Codina
2026-08-30 3:21 ` David Gibson
2026-08-31 12:01 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-01 7:42 ` David Gibson
2026-09-01 12:18 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-02 7:06 ` David Gibson
2026-09-07 16:46 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-08 6:41 ` David Gibson
2026-09-08 8:08 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-09 6:18 ` David Gibson
2026-09-09 6:58 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-09 7:02 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] tests: " Herve Codina
2026-09-01 8:03 ` David Gibson
2026-09-01 13:36 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-02 8:56 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] tests/nopulate: Add a FDT_NOP before the root node Herve Codina
2026-09-01 8:05 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] tests: treegen: Introduce emit_fdt_header_vers() Herve Codina
2026-09-09 6:38 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] Introduce structured tag value definition Herve Codina
2026-09-10 4:51 ` David Gibson
2026-09-10 7:41 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 9:32 ` David Gibson
2026-09-11 7:16 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-12 2:34 ` David Gibson
2026-09-14 10:19 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-16 5:21 ` David Gibson
2026-09-17 7:04 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 5:33 ` David Gibson
2026-09-10 7:58 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-10 9:41 ` David Gibson
2026-09-11 7:53 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-12 2:35 ` David Gibson
2026-09-17 8:56 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] fdtdump: Handle unknown tags Herve Codina
2026-09-10 5:25 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] flattree: " Herve Codina
2026-09-14 8:23 ` David Gibson
2026-09-15 10:16 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-15 11:52 ` David Gibson
2026-09-16 6:31 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-16 8:27 ` David Gibson
2026-09-17 7:11 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] libfdt: Handle unknown tags in fdt_next_tag() Herve Codina
2026-09-16 9:10 ` David Gibson
2026-09-17 8:34 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-17 9:36 ` David Gibson
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] libfdt: Introduce fdt_ptr_offset_() Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] libfdt: Introduce fdt_getprop_by_offset_w() Herve Codina
2026-09-16 9:56 ` David Gibson
2026-09-16 10:42 ` Herve Codina
2026-09-17 4:52 ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-09-17 8:43 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] libfdt: Introduce fdt_getprop_offset_namelen() Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] tests: Add wip_func utility Herve Codina
2026-09-16 10:00 ` David Gibson
2026-09-16 17:27 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] libfdt: Handle unknown tags on dtb modifications Herve Codina
2026-08-26 8:31 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] Introduce v18 dtb version Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqtx_MzOsc3q4Gev@gractus.seuss \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ayush@beagleboard.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hui.pu@gehealthcare.com \
--cc=ian.ray@gehealthcare.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®