From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: vDSO: Avoid call to memset() when zeroing reserved in __cvdso_getrandom_data()
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:26:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aquyVkdYceiWdckX@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-vdso-getrandom-avoid-memset-llvm-24-v1-1-80a92f2e225a@kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 02:58:44PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After a recent change in LLVM [1], RISC-V builds fail when checking the
> vDSO:
>
> arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported
> make[4]: *** [arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile:78: arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.so.dbg] Error 1
>
> memset() is now generated when zeroing params->reserved because LLVM has
> an optimization (now run in more instances) that can recognize at
> compile time when it is assigning a static value to a contiguous area of
> memory and turn that into a call to memset(). Both clang and GCC assume
> memset() is always available [2].
>
> Hide the value of the iterator variable from the optimizer using
> OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR to inhibit this optimization since it can no longer
> assume that the zeroing is contiguous.
>
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90cebef1411617fc3eedd359bdf00cb44b1c2439 [1]
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-16.2.0/gcc/Standards.html#index-ffreestanding [2]
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> lib/vdso/getrandom.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vdso/getrandom.c b/lib/vdso/getrandom.c
> index 2851afa9154f..d48d1fdb3351 100644
> --- a/lib/vdso/getrandom.c
> +++ b/lib/vdso/getrandom.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/array_size.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <vdso/datapage.h>
> #include <vdso/getrandom.h>
> @@ -83,8 +84,11 @@ __cvdso_getrandom_data(const struct vdso_rng_data *rng_info, void *buffer, size_
> params->size_of_opaque_state = sizeof(*state);
> params->mmap_prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
> params->mmap_flags = MAP_DROPPABLE | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
> - for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(params->reserved); ++i)
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(params->reserved); ++i) {
> + /* prevent compiler from turning loop into memset() */
> + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(i);
> params->reserved[i] = 0;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
I don't suspect this is the right change. On x86_64, this changes to
code from:
rep stosq
into:
loc_2D9:
mov dword ptr [rbx+rax*4+0Ch], 0
add rax, 1
cmp rax, 0Ch
jbe short loc_2D9
Which is a lot less compact. It seems like the actual solution is for
gcc&clang to emit this inline memset mnemonic when the platform has a
good one, and otherwise not. But disabling optimizations for all
platforms, because it's broken on one, seems bad.
In this case, the compiler is being smart: it identifies a loop and
rightly turns it into memset. But if this isn't a compilation
environment that has an outline function, it should do something else.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 21:58 Nathan Chancellor
2026-09-16 22:08 ` Nick Desaulniers
2026-09-16 22:57 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-09-16 23:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2026-09-17 9:26 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2026-09-17 17:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-09-17 22:49 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aquyVkdYceiWdckX@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®