From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/25] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:32:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqwWOs0WdAyssc96@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916231320.14502-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 04:12:55PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> Requiring INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY=y to enable AET is a functional workaround
> to enable enumeration of Application Energy Telemetry (AET) events, but
> unacceptable to many users. It results in increased configuration complexity,
> increased kernel memory footprint and inability to patch problems by unloading
> a module and loading an updated version.
>
> Add a registration function to the AET code that can be used by
> INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY to provide the enumeration functions.
>
> INTEL_PMT_TELEMETRY can be loaded/unloaded independently of
> resctrl file system mount/unmount. Perform enumeration on
> every mount and cleanup on every unmount.
Sashiko report here:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916231320.14502-1-tony.luck%40intel.com
Only issues in parts 11, 20, 21
Patch 11: [PATCH v12 11/25] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event
This isn't a bug, but the kerneldoc for resctrl_disable_mon_event() appears
to contradict the core safety invariant described in the commit message.
The commit message states the architecture is responsible for calling this
interface "only while resctrl is unmounted", but this documentation says not
to disable an event that may be accessed while "unmounted".
Could this lead to confusion for callers reading the header file? Should this
say "while the file system is mounted" instead?
The kerneldoc comment is the better description here (supplied by
Reinette in the review of the v11 version of this series).
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f9f3cb40-bc98-449d-a801-6af836900e76@intel.com/
With the intent of reminding developers that resctrl code may not be
idle just because the file system is not mounted. The limbo timer code
will continue to run until LLC cache occupancy counters reduce to the
threshold value to stop tracking.
Commit message could be updated to match if we need a new series.
Patch 20: [PATCH v12 20/25] x86/resctrl: Enforce system RMID limit on AET
Does this code successfully enforce the system RMID limit on systems with SNC
enabled as stated in the commit message?
When SNC is enabled, the true maximum usable RMID limit is scaled down and
available via resctrl_arch_system_max_rmid_idx(). By capping AET's num_rmid
against pqr_assoc_num_rmid (the unscaled physical limit), the resulting limit
could remain incorrectly large, continuing to display an unachievable value to
users in info/PERF_PKG_MON/num_rmids.
This code is doing what I intend. Making sure that the value reported in
info/PERF_PKG_MON/num_rmids shows how many RMIDs can be supported by AET.
Perhaps the commit message could better explain this intent.
Patch 21: [PATCH v12 21/25] x86/resctrl: Export interface to report telemetry unbind/remove
Can this result in an invalid cast for non-PCI devices?
The PMT subsystem allows non-PCI devices (such as ACPI platform devices from
pwrm_telemetry.c) to register endpoints. Using to_pci_dev() blindly here
without verifying dev_is_pci() generates a bogus pointer for non-PCI devices.
...
When this bogus pointer is passed into intel_vsec_get_mapping() and
eventually to pci_match_id(), will it cause out-of-bounds memory reads or
KASAN panics when dereferencing pdev->vendor and pdev->device?
The AET endpoints are always PCIe (enumeration uses the VSEC feature).
Does dropping ep_lock here create a race condition?
While ep_lock is dropped, stale endpoints still remain in the global
telem_array list. A concurrent resctrl mount could invoke
intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(), acquire the lock, and cache pointers to
the MMIO resources of the devices currently being removed.
When pmt_telem_remove() resumes and re-acquires the lock, it unmaps those
regions. Won't the concurrent reader be left with validly cached but unmapped
memory pointers, leading to a kernel panic when dereferenced by AET?
This is an existing issue in the pmt_telemetry driver. Scenario is a
race between a resctrl mount and an unbind of a device. The unbind gets
to pmt_telem_remove() but loses the race to acquire ep_lock to the mount
code calling intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature(). All devices report
valid MMIO addresses and ep_lock is released then pmt_telem_remove()
invalidates the MMIO mappings for the device being unbound/removed.
Perhaps the telemetry driver should prevent removal of devices for the
interval from intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() to intel_pmt_put_feature_group()?
Can it do that?
-Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 23:12 Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v12 01/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add missing CQM feature dependency Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v12 02/25] x86/resctrl: Check if monitoring features are supported Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v12 03/25] x86/resctrl: Enumerate monitor features in rdt_get_l3_mon_config() Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v12 04/25] x86/resctrl: Apply Intel MBM quirk from rdt_get_l3_mon_config() Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 05/25] x86/resctrl: Delete resctrl_cpu_detect() Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 06/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture resctrl_arch_{alloc,mon}_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 07/25] x86/resctrl: Update special case for Intel Haswell enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 08/25] x86/resctrl: Delete rdt_alloc_capable and rdt_mon_capable Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 09/25] fs/resctrl: Remove redundant calls to resctrl_{alloc,mon}_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 10/25] x86/resctrl: Honor rdt=perf option to force enable AET perf events Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 11/25] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 12/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Allocate maximum needed rmid_ptrs[] Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 13/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Allocate right size for L3 monitor arrays Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 14/25] fs/resctrl: Rebuild free RMID list on each mount Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 15/25] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle systems where AET is the only resource Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 16/25] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 17/25] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Register enumeration functions with resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 18/25] x86/resctrl: Use registered function pointers for AET enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 19/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Enumerate AET on every resctrl mount Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 20/25] x86/resctrl: Enforce system RMID limit on AET Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 21/25] x86/resctrl: Export interface to report telemetry unbind/remove Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 22/25] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Inform resctrl when MMIO maps are being removed Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 23/25] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 24/25] x86/resctrl: Simplify Kconfig options for resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v12 25/25] x86,fs/resctrl: Document telemetry mount timing caveat Tony Luck
2026-09-17 16:32 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqwWOs0WdAyssc96@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®