From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Li Jun <lijun01@kylinos.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: remove extraneous #ifdef
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:01:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqyNgA5NdSTdrP_6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqyMnwklQX3ciUzf@kernel.org>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 03:58:11AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 10:12:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > Changing to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() broke here because the
> > tpm_inf_resume() function is hidden in an #ifdef:
> >
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c:615:61: error: 'tpm_inf_resume' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tpm_pm_resume'?
> > 615 | static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_inf_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_inf_resume);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Remove the #ifdef check.
> >
> > Fixes: 2249200ee420 ("tpm: use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS and pm_sleep_ptr()")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> > index 84a0d3e5f679..d6edd2ca39a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> > @@ -594,7 +594,6 @@ static void tpm_inf_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > static int tpm_inf_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > /* Re-configure TPM after suspending */
> > @@ -611,7 +610,7 @@ static int tpm_inf_resume(struct device *dev)
> > tpm_data_out(RESET_LP_IRQC_DISABLE, CMD);
> > return tpm_pm_resume(dev);
> > }
> > -#endif
> > +
> > static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_inf_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_inf_resume);
> >
> > static struct pnp_driver tpm_inf_pnp_driver = {
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
I pushed this to for-next-tpm, which mirrors to linux-next.
However, since this is -next only bug, I guess I should squash these to
the original commit?
Just sanity checking before taking action :-)
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 20:12 Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-17 5:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-18 0:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-09-18 1:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-09-18 1:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-09-18 5:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-18 5:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqyNgA5NdSTdrP_6@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=lijun01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®