From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ublk: don't use an I/O scheduler by default
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 04:26:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar4nU5bVWKdBZXsB@fedora-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-bug-ublk-no-sched-by-default-v1-1-0bc91b6f075e@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 11:10:40AM +0800, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> Requests of a ublk device are handed to the ublk server through
> io_uring, and the server does its own queueing and ordering, so an I/O
> scheduler in front of the device only adds overhead. A single-queue
> ublk device still gets mq-deadline by default, which costs throughput
> on every I/O and an elevator setup on every START_DEV.
>
> Set BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED_BY_DEFAULT so that add_disk() selects "none", as
> loop does since commit 2112f5c1330a ("loop: Select I/O scheduler 'none'
> from inside add_disk()"). Doing it in the kernel also avoids switching
> the scheduler from user space after the device has been added, which
> waits for RCU grace periods. A scheduler can still be selected through
> sysfs. Zoned ublk devices don't need mq-deadline either, zone write
> plugging serializes writes per zone in the block layer since
> commit fde02699c242 ("block: mq-deadline: Remove support for zone write
> locking").
>
> ublk null target, single-queue devices with depth 16, fio io_uring 4k
> randread at iodepth=16, 16 vCPU KVM guest:
>
> mq-deadline none
> 1 device 111K IOPS 342K IOPS
> 4 devices 286K IOPS 1070K IOPS
> START_DEV p50 (1000 devices) 8.53ms 0.36ms
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
Default none does make sense:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> ---
> Zoned ublk devices were not tested at runtime: none of the ublk servers
> at hand (ublksrv, the kublk selftest server) serves zoned I/O.
rublk supports zoned:
`cargo install rublk` or https://github.com/ublk-org/rublk
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 3:10 Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01 9:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar4nU5bVWKdBZXsB@fedora-laptop \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®