From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Amirhossein Hajimohammadi <info@hajimohammadi.net>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: stop overreading monitor interface name
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 12:59:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar4vH3F5lLFijgTU@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026092915-luxury-shush-6b29@gregkh>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 06:05:12PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 07:18:11PM +0330, Amirhossein Hajimohammadi wrote:
> > From: AmirHossein HajiMohammadi <info@hajimohammadi.net>
> >
> > cfg80211 passes a NUL-terminated interface name. memcpy() always reads
> > IFNAMSIZ + 1 bytes, even when the caller supplied a shorter string.
> >
> > Use strscpy() to stop at the terminator and bound the write to the
> > destination buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AmirHossein HajiMohammadi <info@hajimohammadi.net>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Add an explicit From header matching the Signed-off-by identity.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Send the patch inline instead of as a MIME attachment.
> >
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> > index 4416d0ec1..8f5032844 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> > @@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct adapter *padapter, char *name, str
> > goto out;
> >
> > *ndev = pwdev_priv->pmon_ndev = mon_ndev;
> > - memcpy(pwdev_priv->ifname_mon, name, IFNAMSIZ + 1);
> > + strscpy(pwdev_priv->ifname_mon, name);
>
> But we are replacing str*() calls in the kernel with memcpy() calls
> where it can happen, so why go backwards here?
>
> What caused you to notice this change is needed? Have you measured a
> speed up in throughput with this change applied? How was it tested?
This seems like a legit patch to me, although it's probably AI generated.
net/wireless/nl80211.c
5199 wdev = rdev_add_virtual_intf(rdev,
5200 nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_IFNAME]),
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This means that it is a string up to IFNAMSIZ (16) bytes long counting
the NUL terminator, but it could be less. So doing a memcpy() is a
read overflow.
5201 NET_NAME_USER, type, ¶ms);
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 15:48 Amirhossein Hajimohammadi
2026-09-29 16:05 ` Greg KH
2026-09-29 17:28 ` Amirhossein Hajimohammadi
2026-10-01 9:59 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar4vH3F5lLFijgTU@stanley.mountain \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@hajimohammadi.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®