From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Matt Mackall" <mpm@selenic.com>,
"Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] netconsole: finish enabling the target before releasing RTNL
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 08:03:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar51wR0vG6QL2egY@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928-netcons-fixes-v1-1-bb5ffe5e698a@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 07:00:03PM +0100, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote:
> netcons_netpoll_setup() publishes nt->np.dev inside __netpoll_setup(),
> then releases the RTNL and waits for an RCU grace period before
> returning. Only after that does its caller store STATE_ENABLED:
>
> A NETDEV_UNREGISTER event landing in that window tears the target down
> and we end up storing STATE_ENABLED with a NULL np->dev, leading to a
> null-ptr-deref in netconsole_write():
>
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in netconsole_write+0xb9/0x7f0
> Read of size 8 at addr 00000000000000a8 by task pr/netcon_ext0/135
> netconsole_write+0xb9/0x7f0
> nbcon_emit_next_record+0x501/0x550
> nbcon_emit_one+0x10e/0x170
> nbcon_kthread_func+0x2ff/0x3b0
> kthread+0x199/0x1e0
Oh gosh. Thanks for hte fix.
> Store STATE_ENABLED before dropping the RTNL lock to avoid racing with
> netconsole_netdev_event().
>
> Fixes: 2382b15bcc39 ("netconsole: take care of NETDEV_UNREGISTER event")
This should go to `net` instead of netdev.
>
> @@ -552,13 +552,16 @@ static int netcons_netpoll_setup(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> err = __netpoll_setup(np, ndev);
> if (err)
> goto put;
> - rtnl_unlock();
>
> /* Make sure all NAPI polls which started before dev->npinfo
> * was visible have exited before we start calling NAPI poll.
> * NAPI skips locking if dev->npinfo is NULL.
> + * Hold RTNL until enable is finished so we don't race with
> + * netconsole_netdev_event()
> */
> - synchronize_rcu();
> + synchronize_net();
> + nt->state = STATE_ENABLED;
> + rtnl_unlock();
Why do you need to synchornize-rcu with the RTNL held? Why not enabling
nt->state, releasing the lock and than synchronizing RCU?
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 18:00 [PATCH net-next 0/4] netconsole: fix target enable race and configfs read locking Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-09-28 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] netconsole: finish enabling the target before releasing RTNL Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-10-01 15:03 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-09-28 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] netconsole: read np.dev under the RTNL in local_mac_show() Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-09-28 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] netconsole: avoid printing partially updated target attributes Gustavo Luiz Duarte
2026-10-01 9:00 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] netconsole: remove unnecessary target refcounting from the netdev notifier Gustavo Luiz Duarte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar51wR0vG6QL2egY@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®