mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Santos" <Jonathan.Santos@analog.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	dlechner@baylibre.com, michael.hennerich@analog.com,
	jonath4nns@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending in trigger_enable
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 13:24:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar5QVsQs2yrPqdxI@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0b918c9-2ede-4ff6-9ccf-6b819b972f38@sirena.org.uk>

On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 12:58:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 07:55:45AM +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Wed, 2026-09-30 at 14:09 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I'm not seeing anything here for the issue with ensuring posted writes
> > > are completed before we drop the lock?  The write may not be visible on
> > > enother CPU, we need a read from the controller or something.
> 
> > Just for my understanding, why would it be an issue? The trigger register seems to
> > only be accessible from the trigger callbacks which are protected by a lock where we
> > have implied barriers. Im sure I'm missing what can go wrong here :)
> 
> Are you sure that's true for mutexes?  I thought they only covered
> memory, not device stuff, but ICBW.

Oh right, likely not a full barrier

- Nuno Sá




  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30  2:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30  2:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30  2:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending in trigger_enable Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30 13:09   ` Mark Brown
2026-10-01  6:55     ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-01 11:58       ` Mark Brown
2026-10-01 12:24         ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2026-09-30 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending Nuno Sá

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ar5QVsQs2yrPqdxI@nsa \
    --to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Santos@analog.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jonath4nns@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®