From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@kernel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Nihal Kumar Gupta <nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the phy-next tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:37:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar5wFFE64tWhmCKg@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1431 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the phy-next tree got a conflict in:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
between commits:
42b96f94929c9 ("dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema")
a93b9de71466f ("dt-bindings: phy: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy: Add Glymur compatible")
from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
3b0140f37d25b ("dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema")
from the phy-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --combined Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
index 1f1e2a4993b2a,dc64af97da6c6..0000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy.yaml
@@@ -16,11 -16,7 +16,11 @@@ description
properties:
compatible:
- const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy
+ oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy
+ - items:
+ - const: qcom,glymur-csi2-phy
+ - const: qcom,x1e80100-csi2-phy
reg:
maxItems: 1
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 14:37 Mark Brown [this message]
2026-10-02 5:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar5wFFE64tWhmCKg@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bod@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=nihal.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®