From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Wandun Chen <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
ruirui.yang@linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar9ogXc12cLjziHS@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922084256.1515554-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com>
Hi Wandun,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 04:42:47PM +0800, Wandun Chen wrote:
> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>
> On SoCs that carve out large firmware-owned reserved memory (GPU,
> camera ISP, ...), kdump currently dumps those carveouts as part of
> system RAM even though their contents are firmware state that is not
> useful for kernel crash analysis.
>
> This series introduces a MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag in memblock to filter
> reserved memory on DT-based architectures (arm64, riscv, loongarch).
> Reserved regions are marked MEMBLOCK_NODUMP by default so kdump omits
> them; reusable CMA regions are different because their pages are handed
> back to the buddy allocator and may carry crash-relevant data.
>
> ACPI systems already filter reserved memory out of the vmcore through
> their existing path; only DT-based systems currently fail to filter these
> regions, which is what this series addresses. The flag lives in memblock
> itself rather than in a DT-only structure, so both ACPI and DT systems
> can benefit from it (suggested by Rob, thanks).
Can you elaborate how ACPI systems filter their reserved memory?
With your patches, the memblock flag becomes a part of DT-only
infrastructure, so that claim that both ACPI and DT benefit from it does
not hold, doesn't it?
> Since the reserved memory regions are filtered out, the vmcore is
> smaller in size and faster to produce.
>
> The series is based on linux-next and is organized as follows:
>
> Patches 1-3: Preparation and bugfixes: switch riscv crash_mem to memblock,
> fold the duplicated per-arch memblock walks into the weak
> defaults, and serialize crash header preparation against
> memory hotplug.
> Patches 4-8: NODUMP infrastructure: switch crash_core to
> for_each_mem_region(), introduce the MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag,
> add a dumpable flag to struct reserved_mem, and mark
> /reserved-memory and /memreserve/ entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
> flag.
> Patch 9: Exclude MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions from the vmcore ELF
> header.
>
> v6 --> v7:
> 1. Fix a stale MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag issue [1]. Memory reserved and
> marked as NODUMP may later be freed (the initrd, for example),
> so the NODUMP flag must be cleared accordingly. Since the fix is
> part of the NODUMP infrastructure introduced by patch 5, it has
> been folded into that patch.
>
> 2. Drop the "generic" related description in the cover letter.
>
> 3. Collect the Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags received during the v6
> review (thanks to Baoquan, Mike, Rob and Marek). Patch 5 is the
> only one without a tag, as its Reviewed-by was dropped when the
> fix was folded in.
>
> 4. Drop patch 1 of v6, which has been merged separately.
>
>
> v5 --> v6:
> 1. Serialize crash header preparation against memory hotplug to avoid
> out-of-bounds or use-after-free issues.
> 2. MEMBLOCK_NODUMP marking is now done after memblock allows resizing,
> avoiding a panic from too few regions before resize is permitted.
> 3. Reordered the patches, put pre-existing bugfixes earlier in the series.
>
>
> v4 --> v5:
> 1. Rework the mechanism around a memblock-level MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag
> (suggested by Rob) instead of the v4 opt-in 'dumpable' flag on
> DT-only struct reserved_mem [2].
> 2. Switch the riscv vmcore elf header preparation to use memblock
> instead of the resource tree, aligning it with arm64 and loongarch,
> so riscv also can exclude reserved memory from vmcore.
> 3. Deduplicate the vmcore elf header preparation: arm64, riscv and
> loongarch open-coded the same logic, so fold it into shared
> __weak defaults in crash_core.
> 4. Drop the v4 patch that saved /memreserve/ entries into the
> reserved_mem array; /memreserve/ is now marked MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
> directly.
>
> v3 --> v4:
> 1. Rebase this series on v7.2-rc1.
> 2. Add two cleanup patches (patch 02/03).
> 3. Simplify patch 03 to avoid checking whether initial_boot_params is
> NULL multiple times, suggested by Rob.
>
> v2 --> v3:
> 1. Fix out-of-bounds issue if device tree lacks /reserved-memory node.
> 2. Fix UAF issue when alloc_reserved_mem_array() fails.
> 3. Add some prepare patches.
>
> v1 --> v2:
> 1. v1 added an opt-out DT property ('linux,no-dump'). Per Rob's
> feedback [3], v2 drop that property and exclude reserve memory
> by default.
> 2. Split some prepared patches from the original patches.
> 3. Address coding-style comments on patch 5 from Rob.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260917220750.GA4013814-robh%40kernel.org
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260723234126.GA3253409-robh@kernel.org/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260506144542.GA2072596-robh@kernel.org/
>
>
>
> Wandun Chen (9):
> riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree
> crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default
> crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug
> crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region()
> memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag
> of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore
> of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
> of: reserved_mem: mark /memreserve/ entries as MEMBLOCK_NODUMP
> crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF
> header
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 29 ------------
> arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 27 ------------
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 33 --------------
> arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 2 +-
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 2 +
> drivers/of/of_private.h | 2 +
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/crash_core.h | 2 +
> include/linux/memblock.h | 9 ++++
> include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 1 +
> kernel/crash_core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 1 +
> mm/memblock.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-
> 14 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 8:42 Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 8:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 9:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region() Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 9:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 9:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] of: reserved_mem: mark /memreserve/ entries as MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 9:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:42 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF header Wandun Chen
2026-09-22 9:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 8:17 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar9ogXc12cLjziHS@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®