From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F030844D00D; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 08:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790929923; cv=none; b=FMrIHU6NE9RrTwTy7r6jsG5c9aOtOC8mzziS2C9NdbemomZwY86UgDeIYh64P++mLwnWlAFyoXNEnvkt2KmUuvw2RLH1n+3a98GD25nYJPmwy19BBNXMJ1gA/kJt+IlH31ZWjDjOLZTAmPYcpUawkji9xQ2/lEJUNnHtgGg/a78= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790929923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cy7ApzXstdVj4Tfu30LVIjQuadA3Vd94/WodUwBgnkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kXmzh43GUr5tFuvShm3kUBQOimyDXGHe+46t1lKgGBXZJyAWxqCRHb8sgK8Iv24jeTk+CDaEUugOIZuzXZHApU/lNwqpfd0b1MScMU1eO2wymS5ANOAqpCpPrsZZn+bMYmvaZknTaZUIhu5JjTpbcbtpP8a4nnz3E8HfpOea36w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OTpoqiUS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OTpoqiUS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4463D1F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 08:31:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790929921; bh=VhRq2QxjH/GFd6p1HBiOhkCq4H/AIVqR20QgHUYCFkk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OTpoqiUSX6mSnjwKNaqsLx4pbchWeXuWr1t/5MD2p0F4vE9pYos491WzDM6QXbWwx r5rKJ3FbNMqUhPNnrCj8OmPCsiEmJQk5WrFoB1DZj4DrOJPqmRp06g668QtNIM25CM +rhGMK+9CWt0ZCxfDMsuOfip0L8KAz0ihNTiedtHkWPsPlDyPDBiqyJpPAE1cneYhG WdVDNJ6EZE1r8xBHfVSbmA3v+2WP94V+hQDSLvIjhlD2bfrX0//9l7ipTVW7qOzHlE cOGR7ZoxfXPg5JArbHHUbC+SOtCx5dxnNGR8ydbBMv94fSXXyZ07RyC0xRhWgzMWvj kPBRZCOnrL3hQ== Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:31:56 +0200 From: Thorsten Blum To: Herbert Xu Cc: Olivia Mackall , Kees Cook , Michael Buesch , Andrew Morton , Jan Beulich , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris Wright , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwrng: intel - return -ENOMEM when ioremap() fails Message-ID: References: <20260922181102.67309-3-blum@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 05:21:50PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 08:11:01PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > > intel_init_hw_struct() incorrectly returns -EBUSY when ioremap() fails. > > Return -ENOMEM instead. > > > > Fixes: 641dd002d207 ("[PATCH] fix Intel RNG detection") > > This commit ID appears to be incorrect (but the subject is correct). The commit ID is from stable, in mainline it is: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c24c95a085c6b52c11c2f5afecc38b0ca143cdae The correct tag is therefore: Fixes: c24c95a085c6 ("[PATCH] fix Intel RNG detection") Should I submit a v2 or can you apply it like this? Thanks, Thorsten