From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-143.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D763603D8 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 05:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.143 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789969722; cv=none; b=BZvJJMcXmjv1Jr+gi0QSSVakKllTvRgHW3+UJo7T2Txez55dZS5f7UQww/47/xGQ6LldjRaUbz8P3uU+z67RL0ASXLO3R1V4tv9C8d6eAqVNJPgdzE2pux2TCmYIizjgrHzOD4BaahxLUhpMYLr+mJIgBCFNiZQ21ZiYl5mhVHg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789969722; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jhV/vw4+vWN8dqMOnDQNzr0Wd/YKWAZ5SZrLjVrKgJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H0cVQAOF2uo/Hsz/eMWc8KILNfN1RnRXiTVxhiFiIWPWtStJRHWuSuOvzdjgxsnKqAo+/G8JiSPb4e+jCmdgZ5ic3LhArRDAaACWVYvFBM9PmOGeY8U0fa/Y+bNEc9bpJkn1YKIEvpt/CYZDFbgb4Cdzv+5NARcG795HRm4REZk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wsWyZ/it; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.143 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wsWyZ/it" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=jhV/vw4+vWN8dqMOnDQNzr0Wd/YKWAZ5SZrLjVrKgJI=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1789969718; v=1; x=1790574518; b=wsWyZ/itCi6fu86wCCcJ0RZGEFvh1E6p15NlDx9Adkkv4ElC8H2tSzAL4teGcsjDOD6R85qz ElMAx70yL56Y1inpsiwWZHt2hrRRGoQ/lXhLrDGO15qK0CXIIZPbnue43uUKvmPYjDQXRaCwlcP 2RBx/KWVKMVfSuslG0ikOMXY= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by mta11.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 417d6ee2dae11de6; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 05:48:38 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 417d6ee2dae11de6 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:48:34 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Wandun Chen Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, kernel@xen0n.name, alex@ghiti.fr, hpa@zytor.com, ruirui.yang@linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree Message-ID: References: <20260902073116.802752-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com> <20260902073116.802752-3-chenwandun1@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260902073116.802752-3-chenwandun1@gmail.com> On 09/02/26 at 03:31pm, Wandun Chen wrote: > From: Wandun Chen > > Replace walk_system_ram_res() with for_each_mem_range(). A later patch > introduces MEMBLOCK_NODUMP in memblock, the reserved-memory regions > marked with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP can be excluded from the vmcore by walking > memblock. > > for_each_mem_range() iterates memblock.memory, which is freed after > init unless ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK is selected. riscv needs ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK > to filter reserved memory from the vmcore, so extend its condition > (ACPI || KEXEC) with CRASH_DUMP. arm64 and loongarch already select > ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK unconditionally. > > Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen > Tested-by: Meijing Zhao > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) This looks good to me, FWIW, Acked-by: Baoquan He > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index d6c2dbf8455c..1de14a2d5aba 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ config RISCV > select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN > select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_ARCH_DATA > select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > - select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK if ACPI || KEXEC > + select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK if ACPI || KEXEC || CRASH_DUMP > select ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE if 64BIT && MMU > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c > index 26cd2a8bd0cd..808e872f4063 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c > @@ -37,39 +37,32 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP > -static int get_nr_ram_ranges_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg) > -{ > - unsigned int *nr_ranges = arg; > - > - (*nr_ranges)++; > - return 0; > -} > - > unsigned int arch_get_system_nr_ranges(void) > { > unsigned int nr_ranges = 2 + crashk_cma_cnt; /* For exclusion of crashkernel region */ > + u64 i; > + phys_addr_t start, end; > > - walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, &nr_ranges, get_nr_ram_ranges_callback); > + for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) > + nr_ranges++; > > return nr_ranges; > } > > -static int prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg) > +int arch_crash_populate_cmem(struct crash_mem *cmem) > { > - struct crash_mem *cmem = arg; > + u64 i; > + phys_addr_t start, end; > > - cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start; > - cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end; > - cmem->nr_ranges++; > + for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) { > + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = start; > + cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = end - 1; > + cmem->nr_ranges++; > + } > > return 0; > } > > -int arch_crash_populate_cmem(struct crash_mem *cmem) > -{ > - return walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, cmem, prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback); > -} > - > static char *setup_kdump_cmdline(struct kimage *image, char *cmdline, > unsigned long cmdline_len) > { > -- > 2.43.0 >