mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/12] remoteproc: always report VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:47:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arFRqopkkJf7Nlq4@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-remoteproc_virtio_map-v1-5-dac8c5eb4aa9@valla.it>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 11:10:50PM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote:
> There is currently no way to report the VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 using the
> resource table alone, as the per-vdev feature array is limited to 32
> bits.
> 
> Considering that the VirtIO 1.0 specification is now ~10 years old,
> always report the VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature, as some drivers depend on
> it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index 74e0da970f1d..cfd66d9d1c9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static u64 rproc_virtio_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  
>  	rsc = (void *)rvdev->rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
>  
> -	return rsc->dfeatures;
> +	return rsc->dfeatures | (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);

I understand this.

>  }
>  
>  static void rproc_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> @@ -275,14 +275,16 @@ static int rproc_virtio_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	/* Give virtio_rproc a chance to accept features. */
>  	rproc_transport_features(vdev);
>  
> -	/* Make sure we don't have any features > 32 bits! */
> -	BUG_ON((u32)vdev->features != vdev->features);
> +	/* Make sure we don't have any features > 32 bits except VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE((u32)vdev->features !=
> +			 (vdev->features & ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))))
> +		return -1;

And this.

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Remember the finalized features of our vdev, and provide it
>  	 * to the remote processor once it is powered on.
>  	 */
> -	rsc->gfeatures = vdev->features;
> +	rsc->gfeatures = vdev->features & ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
>  

But I'm having trouble with this one.  

First bit 32 of vdev->features gets cleared and then bit 0 to 31 are assigned to
rsc->gfeatures.  Why bother with clearing bit 32?

>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 21:10 [PATCH RFC 00/12] remoteproc: add support for any virtio device Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] remoteproc: virtio: cleanup rproc_add_virtio_dev error path Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] remoteproc: virtio: replace commas with semicolons Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] remoteproc: virtio: support dynamic number of vrings Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] dma-coherent: add base and size APIs Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] remoteproc: always report VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature Francesco Valla
2026-09-21 15:47   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2026-09-22  6:32     ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-22 15:10       ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] remoteproc: virtio: add bounce buffering for data buffers Francesco Valla
2026-09-22 15:58   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-22 19:39     ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-23 14:44       ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-23 16:05         ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] dt-bindings: spi: add bindings for spi-virtio Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add remoteproc-virtio Francesco Valla
2026-09-22 15:40   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-22 19:44     ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-23 14:56       ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] remoteproc: search for a fwnode during vdev registration Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] remoteproc: imx_rproc: always use non-blocking mailboxes Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx-rproc: support virtio Francesco Valla
2026-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] PoC: arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-frdm: add multiple vdevs Francesco Valla
2026-09-22 15:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-22 20:19     ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-23 15:48       ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-23 18:42         ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-18 16:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] remoteproc: add support for any virtio device Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-19  7:33   ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-21  3:31     ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-22  6:28       ` Francesco Valla
2026-09-22 13:53         ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-09-23 15:13 ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arFRqopkkJf7Nlq4@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=francesco@valla.it \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®