From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert streams from RB tree to XArray
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:24:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGEXU2GqmYYBBjb@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-smmu-shared-sid-v2-1-4b656ce68178@nxp.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 07:35:00PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Replace the smmu->streams RB tree with an XArray for SID ->
> arm_smmu_stream lookups. The existing streams_mutex serialises all
> accesses (both xa_store/xa_erase and xa_load), protecting the lifetime
> of returned pointers against concurrent arm_smmu_remove_master()
> without requiring RCU grace periods. A mutex (rather than xa_lock) is
> needed because several paths sleep while the lock is held:
> dmam_alloc_coherent(GFP_KERNEL) in arm_smmu_init_sid_strtab(), and
> down_read() inside iommu_report_device_fault().
The commit message reads very unconvincing.
The first paragraph starts with an action "replace" without giving
a clear reason for the action.
> This removes the RB tree comparators, the rb_node from
Then the second paragraph repeats the action...
> arm_smmu_stream, and simplifies duplicate-SID handling for bridged PCI
> devices.
... and slightly mentions "simplifies". Maybe it should write about
why this is necessary and how xarray would simplify vs RB tree?
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 11:34 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared Stream IDs Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 11:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert streams from RB tree to XArray Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 19:24 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-09-22 14:04 ` Peng Fan
2026-09-22 16:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 12:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared SIDs in insert/remove_master Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 23:15 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-22 14:13 ` Peng Fan
2026-09-22 15:52 ` Robin Murphy
2026-09-22 17:47 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 12:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Group aliasing devices into the same IOMMU group Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Wire up shared-SID STE ordering and feature gating Peng Fan (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arGEXU2GqmYYBBjb@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®