From: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
To: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)"
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)"
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm/vmscan: move struct scan_control to the local trace header
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:24:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arHm0PVMaG08bq-Z@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921114606.3871820-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
On 09/21/26 at 07:46pm, Ridong Chen wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
>
> Now that the vmscan tracepoints live in mm/trace_vmscan.h, move
> struct scan_control there as well so the trace events can reference
> reclaim-internal state directly. The definition is wrapped in its own
> include guard because the trace header is re-read under
> TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ, while a C struct may only be defined once.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> mm/trace_vmscan.h | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 108 -------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/trace_vmscan.h b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
> index c5d824fef554..c8ac5d4e4043 100644
> --- a/mm/trace_vmscan.h
> +++ b/mm/trace_vmscan.h
This looks not good, I would rather see it's added in mm/internal.h, or
a new mm/vmscan.h. Putting scan_control in mm/trace_vmscan.h is too weird.
> @@ -9,8 +9,123 @@
> #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +#include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <trace/events/mmflags.h>
>
> +/* Guard the struct against define_trace.h's repeated inclusion. */
> +#ifndef _MM_VMSCAN_INTERNAL_H
> +#define _MM_VMSCAN_INTERNAL_H
> +
> +struct scan_control {
> + /* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
> + unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
> +
> + /*
> + * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
> + * are scanned.
> + */
> + const nodemask_t *nodemask;
> +
> + /*
> + * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
> + * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
> + */
> + struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
> +
> + /*
> + * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
> + */
> + unsigned long anon_cost;
> + unsigned long file_cost;
> +
> + /* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
> + int *proactive_swappiness;
> +
> + /* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
> +#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
> +#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
> + unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
> + unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
> + unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
> +
> + /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
> + unsigned int may_writepage:1;
> +
> + /* zone_reclaim_mode */
> + unsigned int may_unmap:1;
> +
> + /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
> + unsigned int may_swap:1;
> +
> + /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
> + unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
> +
> + /* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
> + unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
> +
> + /* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
> + unsigned int proactive:1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
> + * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
> + * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
> + * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
> + * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
> + * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
> + */
> + unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
> + unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
> +
> + /* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
> + unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
> +
> + unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
> +
> + /* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
> + unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
> +
> + /* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
> + unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
> +
> + /* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
> + unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
> +
> + /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
> + unsigned int no_demotion:1;
> +
> + /* Allocation order */
> + s8 order;
> +
> + /* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
> + s8 priority;
> +
> + /* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
> + s8 reclaim_idx;
> +
> + /* This context's GFP mask */
> + gfp_t gfp_mask;
> +
> + /* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
> + unsigned long nr_scanned;
> +
> + /* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
> + unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> +
> + struct {
> + unsigned int dirty;
> + unsigned int congested;
> + unsigned int writeback;
> + unsigned int immediate;
> + unsigned int taken;
> + } nr;
> +
> + /* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
> + struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _MM_VMSCAN_INTERNAL_H */
> +
> #define RECLAIM_WB_ANON 0x0001u
> #define RECLAIM_WB_FILE 0x0002u
> #define RECLAIM_WB_MIXED 0x0010u
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0eb7fa8e1d43..2fd9b42f89d8 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -73,114 +73,6 @@
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include "trace_vmscan.h"
>
> -struct scan_control {
> - /* How many pages shrink_list() should reclaim */
> - unsigned long nr_to_reclaim;
> -
> - /*
> - * Nodemask of nodes allowed by the caller. If NULL, all nodes
> - * are scanned.
> - */
> - const nodemask_t *nodemask;
> -
> - /*
> - * The memory cgroup that hit its limit and as a result is the
> - * primary target of this reclaim invocation.
> - */
> - struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
> -
> - /*
> - * Scan pressure balancing between anon and file LRUs
> - */
> - unsigned long anon_cost;
> - unsigned long file_cost;
> -
> - /* Swappiness value for proactive reclaim. Always use sc_swappiness()! */
> - int *proactive_swappiness;
> -
> - /* Can active folios be deactivated as part of reclaim? */
> -#define DEACTIVATE_ANON 1
> -#define DEACTIVATE_FILE 2
> - unsigned int may_deactivate:2;
> - unsigned int force_deactivate:1;
> - unsigned int skipped_deactivate:1;
> -
> - /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim */
> - unsigned int may_writepage:1;
> -
> - /* zone_reclaim_mode */
> - unsigned int may_unmap:1;
> -
> - /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
> - unsigned int may_swap:1;
> -
> - /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
> - unsigned int no_cache_trim_mode:1;
> -
> - /* Has cache_trim_mode failed at least once? */
> - unsigned int cache_trim_mode_failed:1;
> -
> - /* Proactive reclaim invoked by userspace */
> - unsigned int proactive:1;
> -
> - /*
> - * Cgroup memory below memory.low is protected as long as we
> - * don't threaten to OOM. If any cgroup is reclaimed at
> - * reduced force or passed over entirely due to its memory.low
> - * setting (memcg_low_skipped), and nothing is reclaimed as a
> - * result, then go back for one more cycle that reclaims the protected
> - * memory (memcg_low_reclaim) to avert OOM.
> - */
> - unsigned int memcg_low_reclaim:1;
> - unsigned int memcg_low_skipped:1;
> -
> - /* Shared cgroup tree walk failed, rescan the whole tree */
> - unsigned int memcg_full_walk:1;
> -
> - unsigned int hibernation_mode:1;
> -
> - /* One of the zones is ready for compaction */
> - unsigned int compaction_ready:1;
> -
> - /* There is easily reclaimable cold cache in the current node */
> - unsigned int cache_trim_mode:1;
> -
> - /* The file folios on the current node are dangerously low */
> - unsigned int file_is_tiny:1;
> -
> - /* Always discard instead of demoting to lower tier memory */
> - unsigned int no_demotion:1;
> -
> - /* Allocation order */
> - s8 order;
> -
> - /* Scan (total_size >> priority) pages at once */
> - s8 priority;
> -
> - /* The highest zone to isolate folios for reclaim from */
> - s8 reclaim_idx;
> -
> - /* This context's GFP mask */
> - gfp_t gfp_mask;
> -
> - /* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
> - unsigned long nr_scanned;
> -
> - /* Number of pages freed so far during a call to shrink_zones() */
> - unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> -
> - struct {
> - unsigned int dirty;
> - unsigned int congested;
> - unsigned int writeback;
> - unsigned int immediate;
> - unsigned int taken;
> - } nr;
> -
> - /* for recording the reclaimed slab by now */
> - struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> -};
> -
> #ifdef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
> static inline void prefetchw_prev_lru_folio(struct folio *folio,
> struct list_head *base)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 11:46 [PATCH RFC 0/4] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm/memcontrol: drop unused vmscan tracepoint include Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm/vmscan: move vmscan tracepoints to a local header Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm/vmscan: move struct scan_control to the local trace header Ridong Chen
2026-09-22 2:24 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-09-22 2:37 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 11:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mm/vmscan: pass scan_control to the reclaim-begin tracepoints Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arHm0PVMaG08bq-Z@fedora \
--to=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®