From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 042353E49ED; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790051461; cv=none; b=qMpezTbTTViPrhZgEbluKZtoievgpBtQr43ppL8cmiUVZDj4H6VLvgYQZdAQqXYo99xzZGNd6RbYQhG0b2L1PvC6yGzhs2V4Hf4srbojeSu2OU5JALJsp4cGi+USZyzbRJd6KIQ6ZwWz2N86qTjWsSMNJMX0MM0iJD8huudQKtc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790051461; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B0w3NMcmiotTExoUt0aYhmBjhhim2osrYdENDXTORQ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H7IcW7cnlaIFgdqc0sWcZB2X1sbPMDT3s9F34CR6isLY0zUg8jzJi7NxFqVHJH791fRn2rR8ClBtmPs4ujdRQ19bgvXK3JJ1XJcHi0byGOdGvgYw9XzHvdg1Eh5xUv5W90XyjYwOgoJSxAsRP43E3gq6mPdv42mmIeLIupo0ljw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hldADQWq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hldADQWq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72FF51F000FF; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 04:30:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790051459; bh=Qdc5R7bjkdDuaNSCvOWojUk5Sg6yPCfSAhPuY0K7RNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hldADQWqF/hfs8SN4fmi7i5kP1AZdSlkfbJB/gbHkmwAWaZLmLnTQI0XrNAhIWA47 SIQ27wxt5GZOGMjM+hGvIcsLZezM0IfAan3a+ojz5ys8lj83KgGWDmo3+KNlosiyzO Iv65CgDxWAjl4ThF2wf0R3YuxZCpJ5P/LEkbLGIUXyj+Nj6hTfyninHN9PxUboAXj1 tosch+L2yJ3SvcbfAHkwv4RzLjJ92Ixhf9ABr9fittTCBl8UBNAekwKHaURP1h7l+8 cgr/k6MDgrv2IhX8a+N7Sz1HfNWKEVCRVCwc+mMXm/CFrWUpFcBvyTD9y/BRWZU62b BWhX3kD4uHg8g== Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:30:52 +0200 From: "Oscar Salvador (SUSE)" To: Joshua Hahn Cc: Hongfu Li , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Shakeel Butt , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Nhat Pham , Chris Down , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Hongfu Li , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/memcg: migrate per-node hugetlb lruvec stat together with hugetlb folio Message-ID: References: <20260922042054.3264663-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260922042054.3264663-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 09:20:53PM -0700, Joshua Hahn wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:15:07 +0200 "Oscar Salvador (SUSE)" wrote: > > Why do we need the whole thing to be embraced by rcu? > > Hi Oscar, Hi Joshua, > > I believe it's because now getting the memcg from the objcg requires > an RCU lock to make sure it doesn't get removed while we work on the > memcg. I think this is since Qi Zheng's "Eliminate Dying Memory > Cgroup" series. Yes, I understood that obj_cgroup_memcg might need the rcu-dance, but I was unsure about the mod_memcg_lruvec_state() calls. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE Labs