mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Adi Prasan <itsadi2409@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix ie_length bound check in rtw_cfg80211_inform_bss
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:48:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arIyuBbtRu2lwitr@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921170339.1406-1-itsadi2409@gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 05:03:39PM +0000, Adi Prasan wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Went and checked for the things you suggested.
> 
> Fixes tag: git blame shows this check hasn't been touched since the
> original import, 554c0a3abf216 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi
> driver"). Added that in v2.
> 
> On MAX_BSSINFO_LEN: I couldn't find any rationale for 1000 anywhere
> in the history - it's exactly as it was in the 2017 import, no
> comment, no commit explaining it. Header (24) + MAX_IE_SZ (768) =
> 792, so there's already ~200 bytes of slack in the allocation beyond
> what ies[] can actually hold. Looks like an arbitrary/conservative
> number carried over from wherever this was ported from, not derived
> from any struct size in this tree. My patch doesn't touch the
> allocation, just tightens the check to match what ies[] can hold.

Try to find a better limit.

> 
> On the timestamp write - I don't think it's corrupting IE data,

Sorry, never mind.  I was looking at the wrong struct...

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-20 14:28 Adi Prasan
2026-09-20 15:37 ` Greg KH
2026-09-21  5:13   ` Adi Prasan
2026-09-21 15:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-09-21 17:03   ` Adi Prasan
2026-09-22  7:48     ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-09-21 16:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Adi Prasan
2026-09-22 10:22   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arIyuBbtRu2lwitr@stanley.mountain \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=itsadi2409@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®