mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Reject debugfs dl_server writes for inactive CPUs
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:30:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arJ06kuNFepnpG2g@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919153150.2618403-3-sh_def@163.com>

Hello,

On 20/09/26 00:31, Hui Su wrote:
> Commit 4043f5498416 ("sched/deadline: Reject debugfs dl_server writes
> for offline CPUs") rejects per-CPU DL server parameter updates once the
> target CPU is offline.
> 
> During CPU hot-unplug, however, the CPU is cleared from cpu_active_mask
> before it is marked offline. This leaves a window where the CPU is no
> longer active but cpu_online() still returns true, so
> sched_server_write_common() continues to accept DL server updates.
> 
> There is no meaningful reason to reconfigure a per-CPU DL server once the
> CPU is being deactivated. Reject the write when the target CPU is inactive
> rather than only after it becomes offline.
> 
> Fixes: d741f297bcea ("sched/fair: Fair server interface")

Isn't 4043f5498416 ("sched/deadline: Reject debugfs dl_server writes for
offline CPUs") more appropriate?

> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/anw7IML1xzHys6re@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
> ---

Apart from that the fix looks good to me.

Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Juri


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 15:31 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/deadline: Fix zero-CPU DL bandwidth handling Hui Su
2026-09-19 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/deadline: Fix divide-by-zero in DL bandwidth accounting Hui Su
2026-09-22 12:29   ` Juri Lelli
2026-09-19 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Reject debugfs dl_server writes for inactive CPUs Hui Su
2026-09-22 12:30   ` Juri Lelli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arJ06kuNFepnpG2g@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=bristot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sh_def@163.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®