From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, longman@redhat.com,
tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Restore the normalize_rt_tasks() cpuset_mutex exemption
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:41:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arJ3bZ4lePH5pfRp@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922030738.1613919-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Hello,
On 22/09/26 12:07, Donggeun Yoo wrote:
> sysrq-n runs normalize_rt_tasks(), which walks the task list under
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock) and hands every user RT or deadline task to
> __sched_setscheduler() with pi == false. __sched_setscheduler() takes
> cpuset_mutex whenever the old or the new policy is deadline, and
> cpuset_lock() is a plain mutex_lock(), so a single SCHED_DEADLINE user
> task makes the sysrq handler sleep in atomic context:
>
> sysrq: Nice All RT Tasks
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:623
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
> locks held by init/1: 3, last CPU#1:
> #0: ffff9fa2c34e1470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x74/0xf0
> #1: ffffffffb8f66540 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x3a/0x110
> #2: ffffffffb8e060d8 (tasklist_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: normalize_rt_tasks+0x34/0x150
> Call Trace:
> __might_resched.cold+0xe3/0xf5
> __mutex_lock+0x8a/0x11c0
> __sched_setscheduler+0x35f/0x9c0
> normalize_rt_tasks+0xe6/0x150
> __handle_sysrq.cold+0x9b/0xde
> write_sysrq_trigger+0x65/0x90
>
> Test pi along with the policy. The only pi == false caller is
> normalize_rt_tasks(), where the lock is given up since the sysrq
> emergency already voids deadline guarantees.
>
> Fixes: 111cd11bbc54 ("sched/cpuset: Bring back cpuset_mutex")
> Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
Ah, yes indeed.
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Juri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 3:07 Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-22 12:41 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arJ3bZ4lePH5pfRp@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®