mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Wandun Chen <chenwandun1@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] of: reserved_mem: several fixes about reserved memory
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:48:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arJA6fOMetzoBhDH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920092852.614973-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 05:28:47PM +0800, Wandun Chen wrote:
> From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
> 
> This series fixes several error-handling issues in the reserved-memory
> initialization paths.
> 
> The first two patches fix cleanup of no-map regions after driver
> initialization failure.
> 
> Static reserved-memory nodes are reserved during the early DT scan but
> initialized later. The third patch tags regions whose early reservation
> succeeded, so the late scan can skip the nodes whose early reservation
> failed.
> 
> The last two patches reject overlapping static regions. Without
> these checks, overlapping nodes can be initialized over the same
> physical memory, result in data corrupt.
> 
> Sashiko reported these issues in [1] [2] [3].
> 
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260814090305.4C8741F00A3D%40smtp.kernel.org
> [2] https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260814084718.29C341F000E9%40smtp.kernel.org
> [3] https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260806100605.2C2C01F000E9%40smtp.kernel.org
> 
> v2 --> v3:
> 1. Rework the mechanism that checks in the late scan whether the early
>    reservation succeeded (patches 3-5, suggested by Marek, thanks).
> 
>    Patch 3 adds a new memblock flag MEMBLOCK_RSRV_RMEM, which is set when
>    the early reservation of a static region succeeds and checked in the
>    late scan.

Can we keep this local to of_reserved_mem please?
 
>    Patches 4 and 5 are reworked to reject regions that overlap or are
>    contained by an existing reservation. The code makes a little different
>    from what was acked in v2, so the Acked-by tags for these patches are not
>    carried over.
> 
> 2. Reorder the patches: the two cleanup fixes in v2 now come first.
>    In v3, the first patch now introduces the 'dynamic' distinction in
>    fdt_init_reserved_mem_node(), which the following patche 3 build on,
>    so the series reads more fluently.
> 
> v1 --> v2:
> 1. Rework failed-node tracking in patch 1: do not track zero-sized nodes,
>    and keep a reserved_mem slot when tracking overflows.
> 2. Reject static reserved regions overlapping existing no-map regions.
> 3. Keep MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag for static no-map regions when init failure.
> 
> 
> Wandun Chen (5):
>   of: reserved_mem: release dynamically allocated no-map region on init
>     failure
>   of: reserved_mem: retain static no-map memory on init failure
>   of: reserved_mem: skip init for regions whose early reservation failed
>   of: reserved_mem: reject static regions overlapping no-map memory
>   of: reserved_mem: reject static mapped regions overlapping existing
>     reservations
> 
>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/memblock.h     |  7 +++
>  mm/memblock.c                | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-20  9:28 Wandun Chen
2026-09-20  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] of: reserved_mem: release dynamically allocated no-map region on init failure Wandun Chen
2026-09-20  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] of: reserved_mem: retain static no-map memory " Wandun Chen
2026-09-20  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] of: reserved_mem: skip init for regions whose early reservation failed Wandun Chen
2026-09-20  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] of: reserved_mem: reject static regions overlapping no-map memory Wandun Chen
2026-09-20  9:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] of: reserved_mem: reject static mapped regions overlapping existing reservations Wandun Chen
2026-09-22  8:48 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-09-22  9:24   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] of: reserved_mem: several fixes about reserved memory Wandun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arJA6fOMetzoBhDH@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®