From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>
Cc: paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, pjw@kernel.org,
tglx@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, debug@rivosinc.com,
broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] security: Allow dropping bounding set process-wide
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:01:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arK0cT7CGb3Khy69@hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922095816.1191799-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 05:58:16PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The capability bounding set is per-thread: PR_CAPBSET_DROP only affects
> the calling thread, since its bounding set lives in the per-task struct
> cred. User space that wants to drop capabilities for a whole process
> must therefore invoke PR_CAPBSET_DROP once per capability per thread,
> which on a many-threaded process is expensive, and from a Go runtime
> requires stopping the world and signalling every thread.
>
> Add PR_CAPBSET_DROP_MASK, an opt-in prctl that removes a set of
> capabilities, given as a 64-bit mask in arg2 (low 32 bits) and arg3
> (high 32 bits), from the bounding set of every thread of the calling
> thread group in a single call.
>
> The calling thread drops the capabilities synchronously, last; every
> sibling that still holds any of them is asked to drop them through a
> task_work item, so that it applies the drop in its own context. This
> avoids racing with a sibling's concurrent credential updates such as
> setuid() or capset(). The call does not wait for the siblings: a
> sibling may be parked in a wait that is not woken by TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
> (e.g. futex), so waiting could block for an unbounded time. This is
> still safe, because TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is handled on the way out to user
> mode, so a sibling applies the drop before executing any further
> userspace code. It does not synchronize against a sibling that is
> concurrently creating threads, so callers must keep the thread group
> quiescent while dropping.
>
> Measured with gVisor's "bounding set trimmed" boot phase on an arm64 KVM
> guest (medians over repeated boots):
> - 8 vCPUs: ~1.6ms -> ~0.10ms
> - 32 vCPUs: ~3.5ms -> ~0.11ms
> - 64 vCPUs: ~10.1ms -> ~0.1-0.6ms
> - cost goes from O(capabilities * threads) stop-the-world prctls to a
> single thread-group walk.
That is impressive, but please do detail the specific use case where
you need to drop from the bounding set after the go scheduler has started.
I can imagine some cases where you need to do some early setup and then
want to drop privileges, but you could also do that by re-exec'ing, so
I'd like to hear specifics.
This makes me nervous, reminding me of the 'sendmail capabilities bug'.
If some program specifically locks down one thread, I could imagine the
locked down thread forcing wrong behavior from the privileged threads
by calling this.
>
> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Cc: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
> Cc: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 1 +
> security/commoncap.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> index b6ec6f693719..750a7824d3bc 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
> /* Get/set the capability bounding set (as per security/commoncap.c) */
> #define PR_CAPBSET_READ 23
> #define PR_CAPBSET_DROP 24
> +#define PR_CAPBSET_DROP_MASK 83
>
> /* Get/set the process' ability to use the timestamp counter instruction */
> #define PR_GET_TSC 25
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 3399535808fe..ae7ce50a8151 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,14 @@
> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> #include <linux/mount.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/cred.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/prctl.h>
> +#include <linux/printk.h>
> #include <linux/securebits.h>
> #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
> #include <linux/binfmts.h>
> @@ -1283,6 +1290,123 @@ static int cap_prctl_drop(unsigned long cap)
> return commit_creds(new);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Structure used to queue process-wide bounding set drops via task_work.
> + */
> +struct cap_bset_drop_work {
> + struct callback_head work;
> + struct task_struct *task;
> + kernel_cap_t mask;
> + struct cap_bset_drop_work *next;
> +};
> +
> +static void cap_bset_drop_work_fn(struct callback_head *work)
> +{
> + struct cap_bset_drop_work *w = container_of(work, struct cap_bset_drop_work, work);
> + struct cred *new = prepare_creds();
> +
> + if (!new) {
> + /* Out of memory: bounding set drop failed silently for this thread. */
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("capability bounding set drop failed for pid %d (%s)\n",
> + task_pid_nr(current), current->comm);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + new->cap_bset = cap_drop(new->cap_bset, w->mask);
> + commit_creds(new);
> +
> +out:
> + put_task_struct(w->task);
> + kfree(w);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * cap_bset_drop_process - Drop capabilities from all threads in the group.
> + * @mask: Mask of capabilities to drop from the bounding set.
> + *
> + * Drops @mask from the calling thread synchronously, and queues a task_work
> + * item for each sibling thread to safely apply the drop in its own context.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold CAP_SETPCAP. Thread group must be quiescent to avoid
> + * racing with concurrent thread creation.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if allocations fail (all-or-nothing).
> + */
> +static int cap_bset_drop_process(kernel_cap_t mask)
> +{
> + struct cap_bset_drop_work *list = NULL, *w, *next;
> + struct task_struct *thread;
> + struct cred *new = NULL;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + for_each_thread(current, thread) {
> + const struct cred *cred;
> +
> + if (thread == current || (thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
> + continue;
> +
> + cred = __task_cred(thread);
> + if (cap_isclear(cap_intersect(cred->cap_bset, mask)))
> + continue;
> +
> + w = kmalloc_obj(*w, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!w) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + w->task = get_task_struct(thread);
> + w->mask = mask;
> + w->next = list;
> + list = w;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + new = prepare_creds();
> + if (!new)
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + while (list) {
> + next = list->next;
> + put_task_struct(list->task);
> + kfree(list);
> + list = next;
> + }
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for (w = list; w; w = next) {
> + next = w->next;
> + init_task_work(&w->work, cap_bset_drop_work_fn);
> + if (task_work_add(w->task, &w->work, TWA_SIGNAL)) {
> + put_task_struct(w->task);
> + kfree(w);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + new->cap_bset = cap_drop(new->cap_bset, mask);
> + commit_creds(new);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cap_prctl_drop_mask(unsigned long low, unsigned long high)
> +{
> + kernel_cap_t mask = mk_kernel_cap((u32)low, (u32)high);
> +
> + if (cap_isclear(mask))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SETPCAP))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + return cap_bset_drop_process(mask);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cap_task_prctl - Implement process control functions for this security module
> * @option: The process control function requested
> @@ -1313,6 +1437,11 @@ int cap_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
> case PR_CAPBSET_DROP:
> return cap_prctl_drop(arg2);
>
> + case PR_CAPBSET_DROP_MASK:
> + if (arg4 || arg5)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return cap_prctl_drop_mask(arg2, arg3);
> +
> /*
> * The next four prctl's remain to assist with transitioning a
> * system from legacy UID=0 based privilege (when filesystem
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 9:58 Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-22 17:01 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2026-09-23 2:10 ` Andrew G. Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arK0cT7CGb3Khy69@hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®