From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] checkpatch: don't flag ACQUIRE_ERR() assignments in if conditions
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:32:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arMQGUpW2snww9-a@aschofie-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916020921.3480730-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:09:21AM +0800, Guixin Liu wrote:
> ACQUIRE_ERR() and its wrappers, PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR() and
> IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_FAILED(), report whether a conditional cleanup.h guard
> was acquired, and drivers consume the result directly in an if
> condition:
>
> if ((rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(mutex_intr, &lock)))
> return rc;
>
> That combined form is the established style at the 49 in-tree call
> sites under drivers/cxl and drivers/pci/tsm.c, so ASSIGN_IN_IF fires
> there only as a false positive, and every patch touching those lines
> carries noise that reviewers have to wave off manually.
>
> Skip the check when the assigned expression is a call to a macro from
> that family, matched by the *_ACQUIRE_ERR() / *_ACQUIRE_FAILED() naming
> convention of its wrappers. Plain assignments and near-miss identifiers
> still get flagged.
Hi Guixin,
Glad to see you picking this up!
I tried to address the same checkpatch false positive last year. Joe Perches
gave some useful feedback on my v1, including a suggestion to use checkpatch's
$Lval, and I incorporated that into v2 along with some test cases. That may
be useful for your next version.
More inline -
>
> Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Discussion leading to this patch, where the false positive showed up on
> a cxl patch and covering the wrapper macros was requested as well:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260910094017.4032170-3-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 8a7787d228a6..fbc500bcfaa1 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -5777,7 +5777,12 @@ sub process {
> my ($s, $c) = ($stat, $cond);
> my $fixed_assign_in_if = 0;
>
> - if ($c =~ /\bif\s*\(.*[^<>!=]=[^=].*/s) {
> + # ACQUIRE_ERR() and its wrappers, e.g. PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR()
> + # and IIO_DEV_ACQUIRE_FAILED(), are intended to be evaluated in
> + # an if condition, with the error assigned in the condition:
> + # if ((rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(name, &lock)))
> + if ($c =~ /\bif\s*\(.*[^<>!=]=[^=].*/s &&
> + $c !~ /=\s*\w*ACQUIRE_(?:ERR|FAILED)\s*\(/) {
What happens if there is also an unrelated assignment in the condition? For example:
if ((rc = regular_function()) || (ret = ACQUIRE_ERR(lock_type, &lock)))
It looks like the ACQUIRE_ERR() match suppresses ASSIGN_IN_IF for the whole condition,
including the unrelated assignment.
Could you use $Lval, as Joe suggested on my v1, to make this more precise?
I also suggest running this against a small test program with the expected-pass cases,
ordinary assignments, and mixed cases like the one above. Feel free to reuse or extend
the test cases from my v2 [1].
Could you also Cc linux-cxl on the next version? There are several users of this form
there, so it may help get some review and testing tags on the patch.
-- Alison
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20250815010645.2980846-1-alison.schofield@intel.com/
> if (ERROR("ASSIGN_IN_IF",
> "do not use assignment in if condition\n" . $herecurr) &&
> $fix && $perl_version_ok) {
>
> base-commit: 50d05c7c76c96b90462f24debacca971d2e86713
> --
> 2.43.7
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 2:09 Guixin Liu
2026-09-22 23:32 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2026-09-24 3:35 ` Guixin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arMQGUpW2snww9-a@aschofie-mobl2.lan \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®