mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Stop IRQ from requeuing mic_work on remove
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:33:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arOc2HZm3JCf5tjJ@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923030641.992569-1-mhun512@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 11:06:41PM -0400, Myeonghun Pak wrote:
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ static void wm8962_mic_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	wm8962->mic_status = status;
>  
> -	snd_soc_jack_report(wm8962->jack, status,
> +	snd_soc_jack_report(READ_ONCE(wm8962->jack), status,
>  			    SND_JACK_MICROPHONE | SND_JACK_BTN_0);
>  
>  	snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WM8962_MICINT_SOURCE_POL,
> @@ -3203,9 +3203,14 @@ static irqreturn_t wm8962_irq(int irq, void *data)
>  
>  		pm_wakeup_event(dev, 300);
>  
> -		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> -				   &wm8962->mic_work,
> -				   msecs_to_jiffies(250));
> +		/*
> +		 * mic_work reports this jack.  Removal clears it before
> +		 * synchronize_irq(), so do not queue once it is gone.
> +		 */
> +		if (READ_ONCE(wm8962->jack))

This feels a bit like its duplicating the mask check above, I
think it would be nicer to ensure that works as intended than
adding a second layer of filtering.

> +			queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> +					   &wm8962->mic_work,
> +					   msecs_to_jiffies(250));
>  	}
>  
>  	pm_runtime_put(dev);
> @@ -3232,7 +3237,7 @@ int wm8962_mic_detect(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_jack *
>  	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = snd_soc_component_to_dapm(component);
>  	int irq_mask, enable;
>  
> -	wm8962->jack = jack;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(wm8962->jack, jack);
>  	if (jack) {
>  		irq_mask = 0;
>  		enable = WM8962_MICDET_ENA;
> @@ -3247,7 +3252,7 @@ int wm8962_mic_detect(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_jack *
>  			    WM8962_MICDET_ENA, enable);
>  
>  	/* Send an initial empty report */
> -	snd_soc_jack_report(wm8962->jack, 0,
> +	snd_soc_jack_report(jack, 0,
>  			    SND_JACK_MICROPHONE | SND_JACK_BTN_0);
>  
>  	snd_soc_dapm_mutex_lock(dapm);
> @@ -3594,6 +3599,15 @@ static void wm8962_remove(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>  {
>  	struct wm8962_priv *wm8962 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The IRQ stays registered for the I2C device, including across
> +	 * card unbind.  It is the only producer of mic_work.  Clear the
> +	 * jack first so a new handler does not queue, wait out a handler
> +	 * that already loaded the old pointer, then drain the work.
> +	 */
> +	WRITE_ONCE(wm8962->jack, NULL);

So probably calling wm8962_mic_detect() here. Although
granted that probably needs some small fixups as there are a
couple races, probably also makes sense to move the mic_work
sync in there too.

> +	if (wm8962->irq)
> +		synchronize_irq(wm8962->irq);
>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8962->mic_work);
>  
>  	wm8962_free_gpio(component);
> base-commit: 238650ef6c7c7cca08e032527329424c9fbd70e5
> -- 
> 2.53.0

Thanks,
Charles

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  3:06 Myeonghun Pak
2026-09-23  9:33 ` Charles Keepax [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arOc2HZm3JCf5tjJ@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=ae878000@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®