From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 19:04:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arOyMJmOZVRp7Byr@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902021804.718676-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 02:17:44AM +0000, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:17:44 +0000
> From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0
>
> Dear KVM maintainers,
>
> This respin is primarily a rebase onto v7.3, with the following minor
> changes:
>
> * Patch 8: Adjust the core API usage from static_cpu_has() to
> cpu_feature_enabled().
> * Patch 2: Fix an unintended code comment change that was previously
> leaked to next patch.
>
> Please let me know if there are any remaining issues that should be
> addressed. I'm trying to figure out the next steps for the series.
>
> Otherwise, I would appreciate your consideration for picking up this.
Hi Chang,
I tested this series with QEMU master, and no regression was found.
my tests include:
1) Check APX enumeration & XSTATE in L1 & L2 VM.
2) (with AI help) Collect instruction test cases from LLVM/GCC and
create some new, then test them in L1 & L2 VM.
3) Expand the selftest to cover additional KVM instruction-emulator
cases.
All tests are passed at my side, so,
Tested-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 2:17 Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2026-09-23 11:04 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arOyMJmOZVRp7Byr@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®